Do my schedules actually suck for top schools?

<p>Although I never really dwelled on it before, i now think that my schedules so far are pretty bad and "unrigorous." care to share your opinions on them?</p>

<p>Freshmen:
Freshmen English
Freshmen History
Level 1 Spanish II
Level 1 Earth Science
Honors Geometry
Orchestra</p>

<p>Sophomore:
AP Bio
AP World History
level 1 Spanish III
level 1 english
honors precalc
honors orchestra</p>

<p>Junior:
AP Calc BC
AP Chem
AP US History
AP Comp Sci
Level I English
Honors Orchestra</p>

<p>Senior (Likely next year):
Multivariable Calc at Harvard
AP Econ
AP Stats
AP Physics
Honors Orchestra
Shakespeare
Some random elective</p>

<p>The thing is, have I taken way too many level 1 courses? they're mostly during sophomore and freshmen year. senior and junior schedules are definitely better than the first two years. also, because i plan on applying to engineering schools, does it matter that ive only taken 3 years of foreign language?</p>

<p>It looks fine. The fact that you have two AP’s as a sophomore and 4 AP’s as a junior, as well as 3 more AP’s and a college class during your senior year, indicates a rigorous schedule. Also, since you’re most likely going into a math or science major, the fact that your English courses weren’t as rigorous isn’t going to matter.</p>

<p>I’m baffled by your question.</p>

<p>Surely you must realize that you’ve taken and continue to take the most rigorous curriculum that is possible in high school. Do any of your classmates have more rigorous curriculum relative to what your school offers.</p>

<p>So I don’t understand your angst.</p>

<p>Your GC is the one that typically marks official transcripts in terms of rigor. If you really have doubts, ask him. I would be extremely surprised if he says anything other than that he’s mark your transcript “most rigorous”.</p>

<p>well, CC has a way of making people paranoid</p>