<p>I have to complain/*****/whine, whatever you call it. I scored an "eh" 1840 on my SATI (I'm retaking I'm hoping/expecting 2000ish) 540CR 720Math 580W 9Essay. My SATII 790 Math II, 770 Physics. They're not awful but I'm aiming rather high considering my SAT scores. </p>
<p>The SAT is used as a tool to be able to compare students that apply to the college because every school has a different difficulty, courses, etc. However I can tell you I absolutely blow at SATs because I have a "over think" mentality which completely destroys me on CR. I've taken SAT group lessons in Boston (over an hour from my home), private lessons in Boston, private lessons in NH (where I live), and on my own I can say I've taken over about 20 practice tests from Kaplan, Mc Graw Hill, Princeton Review, Collegeboard SAT books. I went from a 154 on my first PSAT to a 182. In translation that would mean 300 points. That's dandy but honestly I did all that to go from average to slightly above average?</p>
<p>I understand that I'll just have to work harder than most people do, but I've been playing chess all my life and it has created this mentality to always think ahead, to perceive the unseen. I will make a multiple choice question a lot harder than intended. </p>
<p>I'm top 25% of my class and I also have the lowest SATI score of the top 25% (one of the highest SATII scores however). If our school had weighted grades I would be top 10% for sure. Even people in 50th percentile have managed to score higher than me. I take the most rigorous courses our school gives (relatively small school) and I am confident I would be at least top 20 (not %) had I not slacked off my freshmen year. </p>
<p>What I'm trying to get at with the paragraph above is to not brag, but I cannot explain how frustrated I am that this test they call a measurement tool is the thing that might make it for me or break it to colleges I am applying to. The test is supposedly testing your logic or whatever BS they call it. It can be true, but how does a student try to explain to someone the logic behind being one of the top students in school yet scoring one of the lower SAT scores? Yes, I'm Asian American so I have a very strong area in the sciences and maths but I'm an exceptional writer and above par reader (my essays, which I've completed, are well above average according to my independent college admissions councilor and my SAT tutor, which they also edited). </p>
<p>I'm not here to start a revolution, because I'm just a nobody to the masses and CollegeBoard. I just want to see if anyone can relate to me, I'm sure there are plenty of people who agree with me but because of my small school absolutely none of them can relate to me from my class that I know of. I feel cheated, ripped off. Why? When it comes to state schools like UC Berkeley they go off a formula and with my SATI score it isn't working in my favor at all. My 4 years of work (3 sorta considering I didn't do so hot my freshmen year, and luckily they don't take the grades from freshmen year into consideration) are tossed in the trash possibly with little consideration because of my SATI scores. Also I get that SATs aren't everything and that my "tossed in trash" without consideration is extreme, but either way I am at a massive disadvantage. On top of that I can tell you I've worked harder to increase my SAT score more than 95% of my class (the 5% I know have worked pretty hard as well) but my scores clearly don't represent that. </p>
<p>Whether you read half way through and told yourself "kid's crazy" or "wow I can relate" please let me know! :) Thanks!</p>