<p>We, um, evolved over time. Our kids were certainly aware that both of their parents had gone to one of HYPS and done well there, and had gone to similar name-brand law schools. And that their extended family included a lot of graduates of several others of HYPS. They went to the occasional reunion with us, and strolled though a campus or two long before it was part of a formal college search. They were aware, too, that we valued having gone to a research university rather than a liberal arts college, but they knew lots of smart, successful people who had taken the LAC route. They also certainly knew we expected them to do well in school, although we did very little directly to put pressure on them about it – no checking homework, or quizzing them, or consequences/rewards for deviating from/meeting our expectations. </p>
<p>When our older child started the college search process, she did a pretty good job of educating us on how much the world had changed, not only since our youth, but since five or six years before – the effect of the demographic bubble and rising international wealth. In the process, she introduced me to CC, although it took me some years to register. We realized that we had to back off – and back off hard – the expectation that she would go to our alma mater, even though we were really rooting for that. We recognized that she wasn’t a flawless candidate in any event. We had – and still have – a very broad list of colleges we considered first-rate (even if the one we had chosen was the bestest of all), and encouraged her to consider any number of them. We also recognized that it was possible to get a first-rate education at a college that wasn’t top-20 of anything. (My wife did, however, formally ban two colleges she thought had not been good for her sisters, one of which our child had no interest in, and the other of which she visited anyway, confident that if she liked it she would change her mother’s mind.) She came up with her own, excellent application strategy, which included an ED/EA pair (neither of which was our favorite) and a couple of interesting safeties. She made her decisions pretty much independently of any of her classmates, and actually ran a little college counseling service on the side, mainly promoting quality LACs as an alternative to Ivy-or-bust.</p>
<p>At the final decision among the schools that had accepted her, we had a definite preference, and we expressed it – and it was for what we considered the highest-prestige school among her choices. We didn’t tell her she had to go there, and we certainly didn’t browbeat her about it, but we made the sort of arguments I think she was making to herself. In the end, what carried the day was (a) she was our child, and when push came to shove her value-system and ours were pretty congruent, and (b) teachers and older students she respected told her the school she chose was a perfect fit for her.</p>
<p>Child #2 had more consistent (great) grades and test scores, and a more traditional “leader” resume. He also lived more inside a sort of “top student” bubble where everyone wanted a top college. He (a) was raised in the same family as his sib, with the same influences, (b) had the benefit of his older sib’s experience and excellent strategic advice and © responded a lot more to social pressure and expectations from his classmates and from his teachers. His college list was much more top-heavy. All of the colleges to which he applied were in our top group, if not necessarily USNWR’s, and we wouldn’t have had a question about anywhere he applied. </p>