<p>“I don’t know”, “I personally think”, “in my opinion” doesn’t translate into facts as far as the CGS curriculum goes, it just reflects an outsider’s view looking in. If you haven’t taken the basic classes in CGS, then you really can’t comment objectively because you already have the bias of a CAS student and believe the “stigma” that’s associated with the other schools. I don’t know what specific natural science exam that you saw your CGS roommates from last year studying, but it seems like you’ve only seen fragments of some of the courses that they’ve taken, or maybe you glanced at a few of the notes and therefore you’ve already made up your mind. The topics covered in the CGS classes are the same as the Core divisional requirements in CAS–the natural science material that reminded you of the biology you took junior year in high school wasn’t meant to be an upper-level bio class for a biology major, it’s a general required class with the basic material that might go a little bit more indepth than high school, which you’ll also encounter in your CAS Natural Science classes. And if you notice, many of your core classes in CAS come easy to you (or SHOULD come easy to you) because you’ve already seen many of the basic concepts during high school if you received a decent secondary education. CGS classes aren’t meant as a substitute for upper-level classes in any intended major–they’re merely general requirements with the same exact material covered as those in the core classes of CAS. </p>
<p>Also, those who are serious and know what they want to do academically who are in CGS probably already took it upon themselves to ensure that they knock out the prerequisites for their intended majors through summer coursework, college-level classes they took in high school that can count credit-wise for some intro classes, placement exams, etc. in order to take upper-level classes for their concentrations. Thus, you’re not that “ahead” of them in terms of having the background and breadth in your major.</p>
<p>As far as CAS not being set up the same way that CGS is set up, that has more to to do with the way CAS is structured in comparison to the other smaller colleges. CAS is pretty notorious for having lousy advisors (or should I say advisors who are “indifferent”?) that aren’t very helpful, especially if a student is uncertain about his/her academic plans or have questions about career opportunities. Smallers schools such as SMG, COM, CGS, SHA have the advantage because they’re more specialized and therefore have better advisors. Not to mention, it’s easier for those schools to have a “clear mission”. CGS has the mission of preparing its students with a great liberal arts education before they transition into the other colleges to focus on their intended majors–they also provide a lot of info about the other colleges for many students that are curious about different academic paths who aren’t yet decided on a major.</p>
<p>CAS is comprised of many different majors and departments, so it might be a little hard for advisors to cater to the Anthropology major, Economics major, Philosophy major, IR major, etc., etc. Same thing when it comes to career services, SMG, SHA, and COM have that edge over CAS kids. I don’t know what to tell you except that you and the other CAS kids needs to complain to the administrators and specifically ask them to address the issue of poor faculty advising (and lack of specialized career services–but again, you would need to blame it on the sheer size and set up of CAS).</p>
<p>You know, it’s funny how there’s a stigma about every school. SMG kids feel that they have the most superb education because of the amount of work that they do and the projects that they have and write off other other colleges such as CAS as having a less superior curriculum. SHA and SMG kids scoff at COM kids and criticize them because it seems that they never have homework, when in actuality they have a lot of projects that they work on instead that compliment the curriculum that best suits the concentrations and career opportunities for students of that college. I mean, everyone has their biases about anything that is different than their own, point blank. Students should just worry about their own coursework and not try to criticize other colleges, especially when you’ve never even done your coursework in those schools.</p>
<p>“But when I apply to law school, I want the ad coms to give me a little more credit for not needing such a transition from high school.”</p>
<p>I find it very interesting how you make it seem as though we are discussing students who are transitioning from community colleges. Have you ever bothered to look at the stats of CGS kids instead of assuming? Not to mention that a good amount of people in CGS are also students who APPLIED to the College of General Studies and have the same exact stats as students of the other colleges. My friend, when it comes down to it, a prestigious graduate program will look at your LSATS, your GPA, and your overall coursework (which there is no required courework for law school)–why do you necessarily believe that you deserve a spot at a prestigious law school before the CGS student who might also have strong LSAT scores (better than yours maybe?), an exceptional GPA, and also the required CAS classes for his/her intended major with those same upper-level courses that you did, etc., etc.? You’re simply assuming that because a CGS student did his general ed requirements at CGS (mind you, NOT classes or upper-level courses for the actual intended major), that automatically makes him/her undeserving of getting into a great law school. It’s funny when people make assumptions.</p>
<p>You might want to take some tips from a CGS alum I know who got accepted to UC-Berkley last spring. I guess the admissions people there didn’t readily judge him as not being good enough for their law school simply because he took his general education requirements at CGS. =)</p>