<p>Looks does matter. More than you would think.</p>
<p>Yup, looks do matter.</p>
<p>I guess it’s pretty shallow of me but looks do matter to an extent. A guy can be average looking with an awesome personality and I’ll start believing he’s hot. But I’ll never fall for an extremely attractive guy if he sucks.</p>
<p>Anyways you guys stress about english grammar too much, I’m only directing this to the people who commented on my grammar- you guys can’t even speak two languages lol.</p>
<p>Too bad having AP french and AP spanish for 4 years can’t help you out.</p>
<p>Too bad this is an English forum…</p>
<p>Too bad the majority of the world doesn’t speak english…</p>
<p>Too bad u mad brah.</p>
<p>Too bad you cared to response.</p>
<p>One little mistake and you guys go nuts. You guys act like idiots.</p>
<p>^ Don’t expect anything less haha</p>
<p>Seriously, those kids are abnormal.</p>
<p>Reedan, we were all being sarcastic. No one really cares that much about grammar. Get over it.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>o rly? I always care about grammar enough to response.</p>
<p>^^^Seriously, you need to calm down.</p>
<p>
Yeah, and then that evolutionary line dies out. No lust, no babies. Lust is evolutionarily selected for.</p>
<p>^I think they meant not anymore, not never. Two “married” people who have never had sex isn’t a very common occurrence.</p>
<p>If they never have intercourse, that means they never have it. There’s a reason why it isn’t a common occurrence.</p>
<p>“If they never have intercourse, that means they never have it.”</p>
<p>In the way English is usually interpreted, it doesn’t mean they have never had it. If you don’t actually care about what the intent was, there’s no point arguing about it.</p>
<p>So I’m guessing if you are beautiful and do not have an inch of intelligence in you, you are the prime example of evolution? We’re screwed.</p>
<p>Aren’t most good looking people kinda low on the whole intelligence thing?</p>