<p>loco, yep...word is decisions will be out by this Wednesday the 23rd. That's not set in stone but it seems likely.</p>
<p>yeah im missing calc 2. Im pretty sure the calc class i took at my school covers the first one tho. I know, I'm at a disadvantage. I wonder how many people who don't finish their prereq's get into the economics major there.</p>
<p>I don't know but Economics is one of the majors that it is really important to complete prerequisites.</p>
<p>dang, please tell me this is just for people that submitted FAFSA.</p>
<p>i didn't submit one and now... i'm worried.</p>
<p>
I don't know but Economics is one of the majors that it is really important to complete prerequisites.
</p>
<p>Not an Econ major (engineering major) but by the end of spring, I will have all pre-req done except for one (2nd part of chemistry). :( Oh well, can't really do anything about it right now..</p>
<p>haha i'm listed in the original post!</p>
<p>i applied again this year and cannot see it again. serves me right for trying to transfer into their impossibly hard to get into theater dept.</p>
<p>adriennevy, why do you think they rejected you?</p>
<p>i can't see my financial aid summary... but mostly because they're only accepting "4 or 5 musical theater transfers" this year.</p>
<p>hey adrien if it gives you any hope...i'm a prospective musical theatre transfer and mine says "You do not have a Financial Aid Summary for this Award Period." maybe the theatre dept. hasn't communicated with admissions yet :)</p>
<p>out of the people in the original post, one was a theater major and one was OOS. The third seemed to be the only "normal" applicant. Kind of a construed sample set.</p>
<p>thanks poppin, I knew there must have been more to the story. It's nearly impossible for OOS or theater majors to transfer in..</p>
<p>lol poppin3000. Irrelevant point, but you actually strengthen mine.</p>
<p>That's not a construed sample set, that's actually probably the most ideal sample of people you want. The ones that are most likely to get rejected make total sense why they can't see their financial aid summaries and why others can, while those who can see them get in shortly after.</p>
<p>All applicants are normal, they choose different majors. Fine even if they are "special applicants" how does that affect financial aid whatsoever? The cost of attendance is still the same.</p>
<p>Also I don't see why sample #1 was not normal either.</p>
<p>Yea thanks poppin that kind of makes me feel better... Who was OOS? Please tell me it was the guy who had all his pre reqs done. Theatre majors have a decent admit rate relative to the number that actually apply so that doesn't really help... 17.49% is right up there with bizecon... Considering her gpa... Is this major weighted heavily on relevant EC's??</p>
<p>No. OOS students pay more.
<a href="http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/budget/fee_fact_sheet07.pdf%5B/url%5D">http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/budget/fee_fact_sheet07.pdf</a></p>
<p>Theatre majors are not representative of the typical applicant, whom usually applies to the UCLA College of Letters and Science.</p>
<p>However, no one has ever denied that being able to see a fin aid award shows anything other than rejection. So you created this thread for yourself, to assert that there's no way fin aid showing up= rejection. I think we all agree, especially people who have been here longer and already read last year's thread. Thanks for the info anyway, both you and poppin have been really helpful to people on both sides of this fiasco.</p>
<p>Well yea I know, when poppin said it's a construed sample I just feel like every applicant gets treated the same. You either get accepted or rejected, ordinary, blue yellow whatever. I guess I just got defensive when a sample of people I took over 2 hours to put together and dig up was being called construed (it's actually misconstrued if you're arguing against it, which it seemed like poppin was.)</p>
<p>Those rejected applicants did not see a summary.
All accepted ones did. </p>
<p>It's no mistake why a many number of people can't see it on this forum, as half of us will probably get rejected. And I'm not saying if you don't see it you're rejected, I saw 1-2 cases where people did not see their summary and got in later on.</p>
<p>kidRobot, I don't think this thread you've created is productive whatsoever. It's obvious that if you can see your financial aid summary that it's a very good sign of acceptance. I don't think it's necessary to go to such great lengths to support such a plain fact while in turn discouraging others over their admissions.</p>
<p>UCLA has a 40% accept rate.</p>
<p>I just don't see how they raitonalize or come up with decisions.
Truly.
Sorry.
Oh well.
2 days. lol.</p>
<p>KidRobot--</p>
<p>What I meant by a "construed" sample set is that the nature of the subjects in your sample set inherently bias any conclusions that could be drawn.</p>
<p>Reason: OOS = Much lower acceptance rate than CCC's
Theater major = HIGHLY competitive major. I think someone in this thread mentioned that only 4 or 5 theater majors are going to be accepted this year. </p>
<p>The group of people I refer to as "normal" applicants are california community college transfer applicants, as they have the highest priority in the admissions selections process. If you had 3 people who were all CCC transfers who couldn't see fin. aid info and were rejected, that would probably be a reason to worry. </p>
<p>And you're right; construed was the wrong word to use. I should have said biased sample set. </p>
<p>To clarify, the conclusion I think you're trying to reach is: </p>
<ul>
<li>If an applicant cannot see their financial aid information, they will most likely be rejected. </li>
</ul>
<p>But based on the information you provided, you can't come to this conclusion because the candidates you picked were predisposed to a lower chance of acceptance.</p>
<p>joehanus, It's necessary for me to go to great lengths to ENCOURAGE my admissions. You don't think my thread is productive? Then shove it. Plenty of people asked about who saw it last year their stats and if they got accepted, who didn't see it, did they get rejected?</p>
<p>I've seen enough "thanks kidrobot" to feel satisfied like this thread was productive.</p>
<p>Plus I look through the first page of your posts and they are plastered with the Cal Rental Approvals, lol.. which is a MUCH MUCH weaker and more speculative theory than the financial aid summary. So you are in fact a hypocrite, get lost.</p>
<p>edit: Poppin I would never want to draw the conclusion that if you don't see the fin aid info you're rejected. I just wanted to reassure myself if you DO, then you are accepted. This is the only certainty I am asserting. I don't believe at all no fin aid package = rejection because I have said myself in the earlier posts a couple people got in despite not being able to review their admissions acceptance prior to that.</p>
<p>and you said I was high strung.</p>
<p>Wow, tensions are running high. See what you do... Cal & UCLA?! haha.</p>