Economics vs Finance

Our daughter is an Econ Major at a small liberal arts school and is considering transferring. She says she wants more opportunities/options that a larger school offers…she’s not entirely happy with being an “Econ Major” but has done really well in her major to date.

She’s been accepted to PSU Main as an Econ Major, and Pitt Business as a Finance Major. I’ve been out of the hiring side of business for so long I’m struggling to find the right advise to give her. To me, (even though I bleed Blue and White and her sister is at PSU) I lean toward the Pitt opportunity. Just don’t see the logic is switching schools and surrendering hard earned credits just to attend a larger school. Her dream job would be to manage the salary cap for a pro sports team or work for an investment bank, and has plans to go to Law or “B” School after graduation.

Any advise/comments are appreciated.

Hi,

Wouldn’t she only surrender credits if she went to Pitt since at Pitt she’d be a Fin major and not an Econ major? All three of the possible career fields she is interested in are cut throat competitive from what I can tell. Everyone and their mother wants to work in the sports or entertainment industry. Investment banking has been the dream job of the Ivy League crowd who likes business for 30 years and the hills are full of lawyers.

I’m not trying rain on anyone’s parade either, if that is what she wants, there is nothing wrong with that. I had a friend in college, a long time ago, who wanted to go to law school around the time there was supposed one lawyer for every 25 us residents or something like that. I pointed that out to her and she said to me, kind of tersely, “yeah, but there is always room for a great lawyer.” Um, okay.

I didn’t keep in touch with her so I don’t know how things turned out for her. Hopefully, one day she’ll turn up on Facebook. I do know this. She worked her butt off academically so I hope she got what she wanted.

If I were advising you or your daughter I’d lean towards Pitt also. I have nothing against Penn St. but I think Pitt is a better school based on not much really just my point of view. If possible, see if she can be a dual major in Econ and Fin. If not, think about nudging her towards finance given that she doesn’t seem to like Econ much.

I’d also explore any and all internships, even unpaid ones, that put something on her resume and got her some experience in sports management or anything close.

The schools down here are putting out sports management grads FYI. They are also pumping out Film school grads for what it is worth. The sports management grads must get internships in their field and while I am sure it is a good degree it is also somewhat confining. For example, some work at ticket offices or in sports marketing offices. For example, one guy calls me all the time trying to get me to buy Orlando Magic tickets. That experience is better than nothing but it is hardly preparing him for the corporate suit.

There is always that rub between doing what one really wants, running off the Hollywood or being a general manager for the Cubs or Giants, or doing what is more practical. My son is an Econ major about to enter grad school at a public U. He wants to teach at a community college. He loves his discipline and he thinks he will enjoy teaching it at the principles level. So, for him, Econ works but he was very close to being an Acctg, Finance or dual major in some combination of the two (Econ/Fin, Fin/Acctg, etc.). He finally decided that he should focus on getting the credential he needs to teach at a CC which is a masters degree in his field. If you daughter is sure she wants to work in sports management maybe that will help her determine exactly what major and EC activities are best. If she is not sure, then maybe having a broader set of skills is preferable. It is not an exact science. Everyone I know struggles with this stuff.

Thanks for input and yeah, Go Noles! I lived in Orlando for eight years and worked with a Bunch of Gators so it was only natural for me to get behind the Noles :slight_smile:

As we speak my daughter is doing an unpaid internship at an investment bank in Miami. She’s getting great experience and as I’ve told both girls, internships are as much about determining what you don’t want to do with with rest of your life as visa versa. For example she spent an afternoon reading over an analysis on the economy in Equador…I think she would have preferred sharp stick in the eye :slight_smile:

I also like the Finance with Econ minor or perhaps she’ll find another minor that interests here. At least if she transfers she’ll have options which is one thing she doesn’t currently have .

Realistically, I don’t think it makes any difference at the undergrad level - both are equivalent foundations for applications to grad school, as well as for the entry level positions that any newly minted undergrad is likely to get. It is her graduate degree and/or work/internship experience that will influence employment prospects. So the internship she is doing right now is certainly a good start, though I question the idea of an unpaid internship with an investment bank. (Nonprofit or government agency, sure… but sounds like the bank is violating the law by having unpaid interns).

But back to your question: your DD should go where she is happiest and/or where the choice is most affordable for your family. And if she is finding she isn’t interested in the reading she is asked to do at her current internship, she might want to reconsider major & career goals entirely.

IMO there is a big difference between being an econ major and a finance major. Yes, both would be perfectly fine for grad school but the educational background received from each option would be different. One is not better or worse than the other, but they are different. Economics is a liberal arts course of study and it gets theoretical at the upper levels. In contrast as a finance major, your D will take a busienss core curriculum which includes classes such as accounting, finance, business law, IT, etc. and then will major in one of those disciplines. Your D should look at the courses required at each school for the majors she has been accepted for and see if one path or the other is more interesting to her. And the work options after college are not always the same as career placement offices/groups at some schools can be different for the b-school as compared to the liberal arts school – I don’t know about Pitt and Penn State. She can also try to contact the career placement at both schools and see if she can get any idea of the career prospects both majors have at the respective schools (might be difficult to do in such large schools, but worth trying).

A couple of random comments…
–Not to be a downer, but I do think your D will eventually need to expand her initial career ideas. Jobs with investment banks are few and far between for undergrad students (and most are from the Ivy and equivalent type of schools) and working managing a cap for a pro sports team would be a difficult job to get out of college.
–The top business schools typically required at least 2-5 years of meaningful work experience so if she wants to go that route she should plan on working after her undergrad degree is complete. Many top law schools also now take a majority of their students after some work experience.

Reading an analysis of the economy of Ecuador sounds fun. If it doesn’t to her, then . . . yeah, there are plenty of other careers out there.

The good part with the b-school option is that there should be quite a few different b-school majors available.

Thanks everyone. I think I’ve got the gist of it.

Appreciate the input… but I’m not sure that I’m ready advise her to alter course just because she’s not infatuated with the intricacies of the economy of Ecuador. She’s finding that she likes the trading desk just fine and the goal is to steer her toward something she loves…I don’t care if it’s basket weaving or managing a pro sports cap as long as she likes doing it.

One thought…It seems like everyone is yielding to the Ivy’s for all the good jobs in the Finance sector and I’m not sure why. I guess if you think you need to be in Manhattan, London or Abu Dhabi to make a living in finance, that might be the case but I don’t think buy it. There are investment banks everywhere and not all of them are looking for Ivy’s. In fact, where she’s doing her internship they have zero Ivy’s , a CEO with a History degree and everyone else are just ambitious, hard working MBA’s who are doing alright for themselves.

The idea of interning is as much about learning what you don’t want to do as it is gaining valuable experience and contacts. She’s 19 years old …I’m 56 and I’m not doing anything remotely consistent with my undergrad degree and frankly, I still don’t know what I want to do…I just had a firm grasp on what I didn’t want to do. So as for her career choices and landing a coveted job with a pro sports team, everyone can dream and have goals and a lot can happen in five years. It’s really who you know as much as what you know these days. In fact I’d more heavily weight the who than the what. That said, having read over the comments and consulted with friends in the asset management field, it seems like forfeiting the credits and getting the Finance degree might look better on paper …

Nor,

I think the reason I am conceding all, or most, of the investment banking jobs to the Ivy grads and equivalent is because, to the best of my knowledge, there are only a few investment banking “houses” out there and yes they do seem to be focused on NY, London, Abu Dhabi, etc., but I could be wrong. I think they might have branch offices to network out when they need to find investors for the securities they sell on behalf of clients but the only thing they are doing at branch offices is sell side stuff not the heavy analysis or trading. I could be wrong.

They take the best of the best because they can.

So, when someone goes to a public U. they usually forgo any real shot at IB’ing although there are exceptions. One of my former students (i teach basic level accounting at a CC) kept in touch with me because he needed references for things like grad school. He started at the CC I work at but he was not your typical 18 YO. For one thing, he wore wing tip type shoes and office dress slacks to class. He was the top 1% academically, not just on how he dressed, but everything he did and he ended up at UF as a finance major and he did get an internship at some big name power firm on Wall Street.

He considered Penn and other places but ended up at UF and he does not regret it. He will make it. He is the diamond in the rough that people will groom and pull along to amazing heights. Hard work will pay off for that young man. He has greatness written all over him. His EC’s at the CC included being president of PTK and so forth. He learning basic accounting in my classes but he fully understood everything he needed to know about GAAP, SEC regs, financial reporting, etc. at our level and you could tell he was assimilating all of that with what he was learning in other disciplines, like Fin and Econ, and other stuff he was reading. A normal student can’t or doesn’t do that.

He is the exception to the rule though.

You might be right about the who you know is better than what you know stuff. But that sounds like rolling the dice and hoping for a 3 and a 4. The sports industry is huge and, from what I can tell, full of jobs, some of which are lucrative and good and many that are not. It is a rich man’s game. People like Jerry Jones buy sports franchises and they play with them like toys. Peter Pan Syndrome. College athletics admin is full of jobs too and some of them seem very appealing although I’ll bet lots of them, in academic support, boil down to “helping” the jocks write their papers which sounds like glorified tutoring to me. Of course, if they steer the jocks to the bozo degrees there will be far less papers, cough cough, to write.

It is really difficult giving a 19 year old advice about careers and such. I am relate very well to your comment that you still don’t know what you want to do :-). Believe me. So how I am supposed to give advice to anyone else? I base my advice on what I experiences and learned and what I hear from others. I’ve been on dozens of interview committees and such and I stay tuned into my discipline area and my career field as well. One thing that stands out, over and over, is having technical knowledge and skills sets is all fine and dandy but lots of people have those. Those skills are considered the minimum requirements just to get an interview for a real job. What sets people apart are the ones who have employable skills AND combine it all with exceptional people, leadership and teamwork skills. When you see someone at an interview who has all the requisite academic and experience you want and then you see that they did all kinds of real leadership and EC stuff and they impress you at the interview with how real and relatable they are … those are the people that you pound the table for. Also, quality people never seem to stay down for long. They find ways to reinvent themselves, grow, create new opportunities, etc.