<p>
[quote]
dcfca...*** are you ****ting about?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>In America, women can vote but horse cannot! It is the other way around in my country.</p>
<p>
[quote]
dcfca...*** are you ****ting about?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>In America, women can vote but horse cannot! It is the other way around in my country.</p>
<p>We must put an end to the suffrage of these poor women.</p>
<p>
[quote]
We must put an end to the suffrage of these poor women.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Hahah!</p>
<p>In my country, they say: There is God, then man, then horse, then dog, then woman, then rat.</p>
<p>Definately Hilary Clinton!</p>
<p>I would vote a Neo Nazi into office over Hillary Clinton. At least one of those two is honest about his intentions.</p>
<p>Ann Coulter. ;)
can you imagine how much fun that would be?</p>
<p>You are sick, iloveagoodbrew.</p>
<p>Are you guys liking the way that Bush is running the country?</p>
<p>Not at all.</p>
<p>Definitely not shrillary. Definitely not McCain. Maybe Juiliani, although a more conservative candidate would be nice. Maybe George Allen (Go Virginia :)). Maybe Romney. Condi all the way though baby :D.</p>
<p>He is running as a Democrat, maybe an Independant by the time 08 comes around, but if he's on the ballot, Mark Warner has my vote</p>
<p>Yea Warner is one of the few Democrats I would vote for..Lieberman is a good one also.</p>
<p>"Hu Jintao."</p>
<p>I second.</p>
<p>which country are u from dcfca?</p>
<p>The thought of Hilary Clinton being elected president makes me shutter. I cannot stand the woman.</p>
<p>I'm hoping that the republicans will find a strong candidate and fully support them.</p>
<p>Thats true about Ross Perot, but back in 1992, Democrats and Republicans would go have drinks and come to a compromise after work. Now they're more likely to try to lynch somebody on the floor of Congress (actually happened before the civil war). </p>
<p>Today, with the incessent bickering and pointless non-binding resolutions (pointless by definition, as they are non-binding), I think america, over the next few election cycles, would allow an independent to carry at least one state. There is nothing in the constitution or laws that says we have to have a democrat or republican. At least have enough popularity to get into a debate (as perot did i know), stand between the two party people, yell "Shut up shut up shut up!" and put forward a real platform.</p>
<p>I will grant that republicans can at least create a platform. The democrats couldn't find a platform if they were standing on one</p>
<p>"I will grant that republicans can at least create a platform. The democrats couldn't find a platform if they were standing on one"</p>
<p>Too true. The Democratic platform seems to consist of little more than "Bush sucks." This may or may not be true, but the Democrats are going to have to come up with some sort of substantial vision for America if they plan on pulling themselves out of the muck in '08. Also, distance themselves from socialists and other extreme leftists, movie stars, rock stars, rappers, and everyone else they jumped into bed with in '04. Despite their support, associating with the likes of these in public forums only weakens them.</p>
<p>^very true. According to the "Vote or die" campain, about 220 million americans died. Also, it doesn't help the image of being the party of the real people</p>
<p>Vote or die was garbage.</p>
<p>"According to the "Vote or die" campain, about 220 million americans died. Also, it doesn't help the image of being the party of the real people"</p>
<p>ftw is this?!</p>
<p>That would be a joke.</p>