<p>I got a 5 on both. </p>
<p>Generally:
I would say to practice multiple choice questions for both tests and practice writing the essays to become familiar with the test format. </p>
<p>Specifically:
In both of my classes, we would also practice annotating sample passages from old tests - highlighting any examples of literary techniques (like similies, metaphors, assonance) and explaining why we marked them (ex. what they contribute to any themes, how they help develop characters, etc.). If you use old essay questions, you can use the question they ask to guide what you want to highlight. You may find this more practical for lang because it seems to focus more on analysis of literary techniques. </p>
<p>Every week we would write some essay from an old test for practice, with the grading getting progessively harder until it was AP level. </p>
<p>I wouldn't worry that much about the MC for either test because they are hard. My lit teacher told us that even she doesn't do that well on them, and she is an English genius (That's a little biased, but she's still really, really good). </p>
<p>For lit, the test essays stress THEMES. This was the biggest thing we covered in class all year - what is the overall theme of the novel (or passage) and how does it apply to society? I didn't use any prep book, but I know that the essay instructions don't specifically ask, "WHAT IS THE HOLISTIC THEME OF THIS PASSAGE?" Still, it was drilled into us that we ABSOLUTELY NEEDED a statement of the theme for all of our essays. </p>
<p>For lit's open-ended FR the major books we read were: Invisible Man (Ralph Ellison), Crime and Punishment (Fyodor Dostoevesky), Wiseblood (Flannery O'Connor), Frankenstein (Mary Shelley), Hamlet (Shakespeare), and Heart of Darkness (Joseph Conrad). You can find a comprehensive list of recommended AP books by using any Internet search engine and searching for something like, "AP Recommended Reading List" or whatever. </p>
<p>If you can only read some of those, I would suggest "Invisible Man" and "Crime and Punishment" because, according to my teacher, those are the catch-alls - anything on the open-ended question can usually be found in either or both of those books.<br>
Wiseblood is very, very, very bizarre if you want to practice your analyization skills. It's supposed to be a good book to write about (Some college professors don't even want to teach it, so a student that can analyze it well looks especially good) provided that IT'S RELEVANT and THE ANALYSIS IS CORRECT. (To clarify "correct analysis" - any analysis from a book can be considered good if you can find text to support your position. Going off on a random tangent won't help your essay score.)<br>
If you don't think Wiseblood - or any book - is applicable to the question, then don't use it. It's better to write a strong essay with a seemingly lame book (that appears on AP's reading list) than a weak one with a really complex book. </p>
<p>That was really long, but I hope it helps. If you have any other questions, please ask. Good luck in May!</p>