<p>I know some of you guys are shellshockin from that ED slaughterfest...but here we go:</p>
<p>Looking at a bio or psych major..
sats: 2180 (cr: 690, m: 780, w: 710)
sat IIs: Bio M: 780, Math 1: 750, math II: 710 (meh), world history: 720
APs: world history: 5, Bio 5
WGPA: 3.87 (out of 4.0). My school has no unweighted + AP is weighted the same as Honors. kind of uncoo.<br>
Rank: somewhere between 5 and 8 /243
Senior classes: AP Spanish, AP Chemistry, AP Calc AB, AP Psych
honors: physics, world literature, adv. accounting</p>
<p>so apparently you can just completely disregard all that ^</p>
<p>NOW here we go ></p>
<p>EC's: captain of math team, captain of chess team (2 yr. league champs), science olympiad
volunteering at 2 hospitals (100+ hours), 4 years on tennis team (lettered), blackbelt in Martial Arts(10+ yrs),</p>
<p>NHS, Dartmouth Coll. book award (o yea), nmsc commended, nmsc special scholarship (ADP), misc?, etc..</p>
<p>Recs: 1 from AP Bio dude: a little too good but somewhere in the realm of realistic
1 from AP Spanish dudette: error_clue not found
1 from my Chess Team Advisor and sophomore US History teacher: divine</p>
<p>essay briefing:
still working on the essay (I know...late...) but its about how chess influenced my general thought process illustrated in an anecdote about my opponent playing this one move and what was running through my mind. Im trying to show how I take a 360 degree attack on problems I encounter by looking through different 'lenses.' In the anecdote, I take a psychological look at my opponent, a novice look at his move, a 'book-chess' look at it, a logical look, a military look, etc.. finally i see the combination of moves he's planning, and realize that I'm going to lose...(still working on a closer). Theres some self-commentary interspersed between paragraphs...yup thats the plan.</p>
<p>confidence rate at the moment: 35%
also whoever maintains the patience to read all that gets a prize.
cheers</p>