<p>Thks for the info in my last post ixjunitxi, but I think now I'm leaning towards NYU. I have read much about General Studies on these forums over the last few hours and a few things really distress me. </p>
<p>I understand that the admissions for GS are less stringent than Columbia College and that doesn't bother me because I know that I still worked hard and received the best possible grades in my two years of CC work (4.0, All A's through 54 credits). The way I look at it, GS students may have had an easier time getting into Columbia but in the end, things work out because students from the College and GS are intergrated into the same core and electives, sitting right next to each other in the same classes. So the unqualified students would be quickly weeded out or drop out on their own .</p>
<p>This is why the lengths that Columbia goes to in differentiating GS from Columbia College upsets me. If I survive my first semester and go on to graduate with a 3.8 GPA and some kid from Columbia College graduates with a 3.0, why do I receive a degree that is not even printed in Latin and makes a point of spelling out "General Studies". The term "General Studies" is too similar to other university programs that amount to nothing more than extension schools or continuing ed...</p>
<p>Considering I'm being charged the same tuition, taking the same curriculum, getting graded by the same professors... in the same classes as Columbia College and SEAS students, I don't see how the school can justify attempting to "water" down my accomplishment in a potential recruiter's eyes. I don't even get access to the same alumni network, listing in the job database or career services as Columbia College grads.</p>
<p>Basically I feel like I'm getting ripped off... Yes, I'm receiving a "Columbia" education and a "Columbia" Degree but why does the school go all out to make me feel like I'm really not a legitimate Columbia Grad?</p>
<p>I'm sorry but Columbia can't have it both ways...there is a definite pool of legit "non-traditional" students who are Columbia material. If Columbia wants to tap into that pool, take thier money and put them through the same rigorous course work once they arrive on campus, they cannot continue to justify perpetuating and aiding in the "second class" alumni stereotype that seems to be pervasive around some circles. </p>
<p>Well, they can and I'm sure they will continue to do so in order to reap the financial rewards without suffering the wrath of some (not all) of the spolied kids at Columbia College who may start crying if GS is FULLY integrated as an EQUAL school in Columbia, but the fact that they will continue to do it doesn't make it right. Hopefully more students who are truly qualified and get accepted into the FULL programs at other schools will also shun GS and send the administration a message.</p>
<p>At least NYU isn't suffering from the same split personality. They judged my superior academic record, took into account my non-traditional background and deemed me worthy to be a regular student at CAS, just like any other applicant. Columbia could easily admit an extra 100 or 150 non-traditional students into Columbia College with a few restrictions like access to on-campus student dorms but the other restrictions I mentioned are inexcusable in my view.</p>
<p>I'm sure there are a lot of current and former GS students who will vehemently disagree and that's fine, I'm sure you all of have good points and may say that I have a warped opinion on the matter but in any case, I feel my concerns are real. In the end you have to trust your own gut feeling and do what you feel is best for your own life. I think I'll be just fine if I graduate from NYU, with a real NYU degree. I'll have a top education under my belt, have access to all support and alumni services commensurate with an NYU graduate and I won't ever have to deal with a company questioning the legitimacy of my educational accomplishments.</p>