For the Deferred of Columbia College, Including Myself

<p>This post may seem pessimistic to say the least, but at the same time, it's just a look at reality in terms of Columbia Colleges Admissions process. 1956 applicants applied last year ED to CC. Eventually, only 6 were admitted from the deferred applicant pool. I have heard people say that Columbia chooses its deferral pool very carefully, but at the same time...</p>

<p>"26.1% of Early Decision applicants to Columbia College were deferred to Regular Decision."</p>

<p>That's around 510 kids, and for only 6 to get admitted into CC after getting deferred makes the acceptance rate among this specific group a mere 1.2%. That's a pretty scary number, considering most of us still probably consider Columbia our #1 after being deferred. With a much larger percentage applying this year than last, that percentage is most likely lower than 1%.</p>

<p>This is what I realized after visiting the Columbia Admissions site and I may be blowing this out of proportion, but the numbers and stats are there. It's relatively depressing to me, especially after those around me kept telling me getting deferred, is way better than getting rejected, but at this point, it seems that the two are almost indifferentiable.</p>

<p>Of course, people say, there are "so many other colleges, that are great!" Well, I'm sure that's true in certain aspects, but for me, there isn't a school that really comes close to Columbia from my perspective.</p>

<p>Sorry if this thread is depressing, but my main purpose was to just get some of my frustration out somehow. Just one criticism towards all selective college admissions, they may have chosen some of the best applicants stats wise, but truthfully, it's not fair to base an individual's potential upon high school stats and achievements. I don't think it's fair that our society decides that it is accurate to determine someone's intellectual capacity and future just by what they have done in a mere 4 years. This post may make you give up or it may make you work even harder to sway the admissions office, but I've concluded that the admissions process can really seem like a crapshoot sometimes. I'm sure I'll get criticized for this, especially since it seems I criticize some of those accepted, but don't take the post personally, if you know you were a great candidate, and you know you deserved to go to Columbia, then you should feel comfortable with yourself and you should be proud of yourself. Good luck to all.</p>

<p>
[quote]
Eventually, only 6 were admitted from the deferred applicant pool.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>where is this number from? Link please. If true, that's staggering; I've never seen anything like that. Anecdotally, it seems more common than that. That's way the heck worse than your chances of getting off a waiting list, too.</p>

<p>Check out the Columbia site. <a href="http://www.studentaffairs.columbia.edu/admissions/applications/stats.php%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.studentaffairs.columbia.edu/admissions/applications/stats.php&lt;/a> It says "Admitted Waitlist Students: 6," which means six people were admitted after being waitlisted in April when RD decisions come out. Deferral =/= waitlist.</p>

<p>I thought I smelled BS. Maybe critical reading skills are the reason for his deferral ;)</p>

<p>"I don't think it's fair that our society decides that it is accurate to determine someone's intellectual capacity and future just by what they have done in a mere 4 years."</p>

<p>Unfortunately, there is no way to measure potential. Eveyrone will claim to have it at admissions time, and most students have great potential and can prove it at any school. Selective colleges have to use stats for the majority of the decision among the regular(non athlete, legacy, URM, insane EC person) applicants, and I don't blame them for it.</p>

<p>Columbia2002 Nice burn</p>

<p>
[quote]
"I don't think it's fair that our society decides that it is accurate to determine someone's intellectual capacity and future just by what they have done in a mere 4 years."</p>

<p>Unfortunately, there is no way to measure potential. Eveyrone will claim to have it at admissions time, and most students have great potential and can prove it at any school. Selective colleges have to use stats for the majority of the decision among the regular(non athlete, legacy, URM, insane EC person) applicants, and I don't blame them for it.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>I didn't even read that far, so I missed the 4 years thing. 4 years is a long time; that's 25% of your life since you learned how to poop in the porcelain bowl rather than in your pants. Compare the admissions criteria at top US colleges -- which look at a lot of things over a 4 year period -- to that of Japan or China, where you're judged on a day's worth of standardized tests.</p>

<p>you are wrong. deferred is not the waitlist. </p>

<p>here is a quote from my deferral LETTER!</p>

<p>"In past years, deferred Early Decision candidates have been
admitted at a rate comparable to Columbia's overall acceptance rate."</p>

<p>You have a 9-10% chance. Still sucks though :( (way below the 25% ED)</p>

<p>i agree with columbia2002, consider us americans lucky</p>

<p>LOL at "that's a pretty scary number"</p>