<p>I totally disagree with this comment from Monoclide:
And there is no hate towards Fordham. I feel that it sets kids up to have a job in the real world. I don’t agree with that idea - college is to learn. Not to set yourself up for a job.</p>
<p>Fordham’s rich liberal arts curriculum, which is very proscribed and requires students to take courses outside of their area of interests, is the meat of a liberal arts education. My daughter’s friend who is at NYU is taking more courses as a freshman in her area of interest, and my experience is that many if not most kids don’t end up in a career working in the area that they originally studied in college. Fordham’s very rich required curriculum provides a great liberal arts foundation, no matter what your ultimate career is. That was actually one of the things I was most concerned with when we looked at colleges for my daughter and one that ultimately I thought was the biggest advantage. In fact, she got accepted at Emerson and the down side to that (besides Boston v. NYC) was that it was heavy in concentration in what her planned major was now. Speaking from experience and the wisdom of my 53 years, having a major concentration in what an 18 year old is interested in at the moment is not, in my opinion, as valuable as a rich liberal arts education that forces a student to take courses outside of their current area of interest.</p>