I think parental behavior varies by district. I also think we are seeing some of the effects of the so-called “Big Sort;” there is a book by that name that outlines how we are choosing ever more to live near people like us (like us on multiple levels, down to political leanings and hobbies.)
There was a study going around in the '90s which purported to show that parental involvement correlated with educational outcomes. Thus, schools developed mandatory parent involvement “opportunities,” such as projects which relied upon parental support. It’s easier to encourage parents to “monitor and support” their children in the early grades than to discourage them from helping in later grades, especially when the tactic pays off. The advent of online grading portals has accelerated the trend.
We are lazy parents. Our involvement was limited to procuring supplies and vetoing overly ambitious projects. It was very interesting to observe other students’ projects on the project fair days. Truly amazing how adept preschoolers were with power tools and hot glue guns.
In my darker moments, I definitely see clear rationing of educational opportunities in the districts I know. In one instance, at gathering of family and friends in another town, we learned that a bright boy of our acquaintance had been given a schedule at his local high school with no science class. Not “oh, he got the bad teacher.” Not in a regular level rather than honors (and this boy should have been in honors.) No science class at all.
Call us helicopter parents if you will, but my cousin and I spent significant time convincing his mother that she had to physically show up at the guidance department office to get his schedule changed. Not a phone call, not an email, but a body waiting in the waiting room. She followed our advice. His schedule was changed. He’s now at our state flagship on a full scholarship. I doubt he would have had the academic record to qualify for a scholarship, had he not had an adequate high school transcript.
As Annette Lareau portrayed in her study, Unequal Childhoods, http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/02/explaining-annette-lareau-or-why-parenting-style-ensures-inequality/253156/, different classes parent differently. We are involved, upper middle class mothers. She was a working class mother who trusted the school system more than we did. Our default mode was to confront an obviously wrong schedule. Her default mode was to assume the school must have had a reason.
Thus this morning I will advance the theory that if a dean at Stanford perceives a rise in “helicopter parenting,” it may be because its student body is drawn from the middle and upper classes. This is not an income-based class division, but a behavior-based division.