<p>Poor scottie has to keep dropping farther down the list of minor sports to find someplace where Princeton can succeed. </p>
<p>The fear is that the feminocracy now running the place are more interested in ballet dancers and "green-haired people" than in the manly sort who used to promenade on "the Street"!</p>
<p>Poor scottie has to keep dropping farther down the list of minor sports to find someplace where Princeton can repeat. </p>
<p>The fear is that the feminocracy now running the place are more interested in ballet dancers and "green-haired people" than the manly sort who used to promenade on "the Street"!</p>
<p>spare me. i read about the golf digest rankings on an ivy league football board of all places. further, i think we both can agree that sailing is a "minor sport," so in the interest of consistency, try not mentioning that again.</p>
<p>"Spare you???" I rather recall that <em>you</em>, scottie, were the OP on this thread - breathlessly reporting the pre-season "golf rankings" (academic division!)</p>
<p>Wow, it still amazes me how Byerly doesnt care about how ridiculous he makes himself look after each and every post. Come on guys, one big Tiger laugh at this poor, sad man. </p>
<p>The 7-7 Harvard men finished ahead of the 6-8 Princeton lads, and the 12-2 Harvard women finished ahead of the 5-9 Princeton persons while copping the Ivy crown!</p>
<p>Even last year, in the men's basketball series (not to be sexist but women's basketball simply does not compare to men's in terms of popularity) between H and P, the series was split 1-1 with Harvard winning the first game by 4 points and Princeton taking the second by 22.</p>
<p>Byerly, I don't quite now why you refer to 2004 as though it were the distant past. Duke didn't win the NCAA tournament last year, is Duke suddenly mediocre in basketball?</p>