This grade appeal I’m going through is a pretty dramatic mess. First off my professor has been treating me like crap in his class all throughout the semester. He has told me that if I didn’t like “the way he taught” (aka harassing me), then I should have dropped out in the first month. This man told me that I should’ve dropped out! And I had an A in his class.
He has also admitted that he doesn’t care about the other students… Including me of course. I literally have these two big things on recording, I also have on recording that he felt that he treated me so badly that I will connect the material I learned in the class to him whenever I have to use it in the real world.
This is what my professor and the chairperson is talking about:
Okay, so. We had a group presentation to do which is on the syllabus and its a 5% weight, he AND the chairperson decided to remove it and reallocated the % to the 3rd and 4th exam to make back up to 100%.
—Whatever they decided to do with that is not my problem-----
This is what I received for the extra credit: A guideline sheet saying that I would receive 5% of my final grade. My problem is that instead of my professor grading me the way the guideline sheet says, he decided to add 5% onto my final exam grade, which has a 20% weight. He said in the email that him and his supervisor were AFRAID (actual word) to do that because the final exam is 20% weight, I think that they were hoping that I wouldn’t think back to the guideline sheet that I did it for.
This is suspicious.
****My professor has been having contact with the chairperson before the grade appeal, after I told her I wanted the appeal, and during the appeal process, so my professors original reasoning switched up from, “not good enough” in his original email to mimicking the chairperson. How do I know this? Because I’m in the middle of the appeal process and he took a snip from the email and I see the dates and who they email was sent to. I’m guessing that he slipped a little bit, but not too much because he made sure to keep out any emails he sent to her with words.
They’re trying to say that the group presentation, and the extra credit oral presentation guideline is the same thing. The chairperson said in the email that THERE IS NO SUCH THING as 5% of the final grade and that I received the maximum grade. You see, it says it on the guideline paper. As far as I know but the guideline paper is like apart of the syllabus, so not only is my professor changing the grading criteria after I already finished my paper but they are both aren’t acknowledging that it even exist.
In both of their explanations that was sent to me and the dean, they both left out the guideline sheet. They left out the ONLY thing of relevance.
I also have a history with the chairperson too, because I reached out to her for help for her to tell the professor to treat me equally and with respect. She didn’t do anything to help…
Also in the appeal they told even more lies, which can easily be destroyed by facts. They’re treating my grade like a freakin game.
This would not only change the outcome in my class but also on my GPA , making it an A. So yeah… I’m pretty pissed they decided to rain on my parade. What do you think?