Prompt:Is it absolutely necessary for people to study creative arts?
The notion that it is necessary for people to study creative arts is a categorical truth. Creative arts are a salient knowledge that should be taken into consideration. This point of view is advocated through prominent and cogent archetypes of literature and history.
In 1972, A competition between men was held in Detroit. This competition tests the competitor’s knowledge. Most of the questions were about history of famous people. But when there were only 2 competitors left, questions started to get harder, the competitors were Charles Vetra and Michael Hevels. The last question was about arts. This knowledge made him win the competition and made him famous.
The second example is supported by a novel called An Abundance of Katherines by John Green. It was puvlished in 2006. Collin, the main character, read a lot of books of variegated genres. One of his favorite books was a book about arts that talked about ancient music. One time when he was interviewed by a college, he was asked several general questions. One of the questions was related to arts. His copious knowledge of arts, as well as other subjects, helped gain to gain the favor of the college.
The third example was about an incident that took place in China in 1747. As mentioned by a newspaper, there was an enigma that was thought to be impossible to be solved unit a man called Chan Hun though about it. Chang Hun read a lot of books about arts and was an art teacher. He thought about this enigma in an artistic way and discerned that this enigma was a pattern found in a painting that he had. Chang Hun solved this cryptic puzzle and earned a huge amount of money because he was able to solve an impossible puzzle.
These three salient and empirical examples corroborate the point of view present in this essay and debunk opposite points of views.