<p>So I did a some of the Gruber CR & Grammar sections and I did HORRIBLY.
To me, the GRUBER tests were way harder than the real SAT, but on Amazon.com reviews, people said the two tests were more or less the same. </p>
<p>So which is true? Does Gruber accurately predict a SAT score?</p>
<p>yeah imo gruber is harder than the real sat</p>
<p>I find Gruber's CR section tough and even against logic sometimes. I rarely make mistakes on the Blue Book or Princeton review, got 780 verbal in my first SAT I, and consistently get +740 for every practice test, but I cannot break Gruber's? Does anyone share my opinion?</p>
<p>(booom) bump.......</p>
<p>yeah; gruber's is harder for me too.</p>
<p>I e-mailed Dr. Gruber, and he told me that the practice tests in his book are harder than the real thing.</p>
<p>I did one of his writing sections, and I got waaay more wrong than usual.</p>
<p>should i move from bluebook to rocket review to grubers or blue to gruber?</p>
<p>I'd just stick w/ BB. If you have time, use the others.</p>
<p>HAHA Ashraf.. you emailed Dr. Gruber.</p>
<p>idk much about rocket review, but i would just go blue-> grubers.
start w/ blue to 'get a feel' of the test and then go to grubers for a challenge.</p>