<p>I just don’t get how the system is unfair.</p>
<p>Let say both the 40K family and the 150K family want to send their child to College X, which costs 50K.</p>
<p>And let’s say that the 40K family pays nothing and the 150K family pays the whole thing.</p>
<p>Now, let us also say that the 40K family pays about 30% of its gross income in taxes etc.</p>
<p>40,000*.3=12000. 40000-12000= $28,000 So let’s say that the 40K family lives on 2333 dollars a month.</p>
<p>Now, let’s say that the 150K family pays about 40% of its gross income in taxes etc.</p>
<p>150000*.4=60000 150000-60000=$90000. So let’s say that the 150K family lives on $7500 per month.</p>
<p>Now, assume that the amount $2333.00 per month the 40K family lives on is doable. So this means that the 150K family can live on $2333.00, leaving $5167 dollars for college per month. $5167*12 months= $62004. More than enough for college expenses.</p>
<p>So I don’t see how the 40K family is ‘getting more’. Both families will subsist on the same amount and both families will have a child at expensive college X. </p>
<p>I’m sure that I have done some estimations wrong here, but even supposing that the 40K family has only $2000 to live on a month and the 150K family has only $6000, if the 150K family tries to live on $2000 per month, there is still $4000 over to pay for college * 12 equals $48000, which is darn close.</p>
<p>How is there massive redistribution of wealth here?</p>
<p>I think what is going on here is that you feel that because you must make sacrifices to your lifestyle to afford College X, the 40K family must also. I think what seems unfair is that you are making sacrifices to your lifestyle, while the 40K family is not.</p>