<p>Has anyone ever read a couple books on a course(e.g. macroeconomics, Western Civilization) over the summer and taken an examination later in the fall for credits?</p>
<p>If this is possible, what do you think are the easiest courses to teach yourself?</p>
<p>I would take a summer course on the topic, but money is tight...</p>
<p>Introductory macroeconomics isn’t too hard to teach by yourself. IMO, it’s harder to memorize all the information for western civ, whereas macro only requires some common sense, and knowing about 30 words.</p>
<p>are there any other classes you think i could easily teach myself (sorry if this sounds pretentious, but I really dont want to waste my time (and $$$$) in a simple tic-tac course.)</p>
<p>Well you can always study history, astronomy/biology for non-scientists or something else thats memorization intensive but requiring no critical thinking. But that could be done during school with minimal effort(i.e night before midterm). The way I see it, you’re going to have to pay for the courses anyway. So why waste time? Especially if you can get an A the first time around.</p>
<p>a lot of college classes are just glorified self-study anyway. you won’t get much more out of a class than you would out of a textbook. even for hard classes.</p>
<p>My university requires 2 years of a foreign language to get in, and another year of one that you didn’t study in high school to graduate.</p>
<p>I want to study german in college. It’s more fascinating than spanish was. I plan on studying it on my own over the summer so that i am a bit more familiarized!</p>
<p>history classes. the teacher pretty much summarized what was in the textbook during lecture. but i guess it’s good for people to hear somebody else say it outloud, though i don’t find it completely necessary.</p>
<p>at least at my school, you couldn’t teach yourself history or econ out of a book. The classes are verrry intensive, often seminar-style with many required papers/problem sets and a lot of discussion. Textbooks are only half the story, and for microeconomics they tend to suck.</p>