<p>I’m a 4.0 student and didn’t even get an invitation letter… don’t think I’m going to get it from here on out either.</p>
<p>Damn. Maybe they just only offered like 5 this year, or something.</p>
<p>I actually believe Celtics that some regents have been announced, but I think they are still in the process of releasing them, or at least I hope for your guys’ sake.</p>
<p>life goes on. i didn’t get it. you guys didn’t get it. get over it. regents have already been released. i already told you this. this is the 3rd time i’m saying it on this thread alone. if u still don’t believe me, or even alejandra (the UCLA FA girl), then u shouldn’t have been accepted in the first place. seriously, get over it.</p>
<p>i got it. its 2000 plus some other good perks.</p>
<p>^there. thats enough proof that its out.</p>
<p>That’s definitely not enough proof that its out. No screenshot.</p>
<p>[regents</a> on Flickr - Photo Sharing!](<a href=“http://www.■■■■■■■■■■/photos/unphazedd/4545245362/]regents”>http://www.■■■■■■■■■■/photos/unphazedd/4545245362/)</p>
<p>ok i take that back. ^ is an idiot. that letter is for freshman</p>
<p>Even though you are a freshman, I am still curious. Did you get that letter at the same time as admission or afterwards?</p>
<p>i am a transfer student and this letter is for transfer students, as it clearly states its for 2 years.</p>
<p>^why does the letter say it’s the “highest honor for freshman”? whatever good job</p>
<p>i dont know. i just re-read that congratulations letter, and its mention of freshmen only is curious, but on another page it states:
“The UCLA Committee on Honors, Awards and Prizes is very pleased to award you the 2010-11 Regents Scholarship! The Regents Scholarship is the most prestigious and highest honor bestowed upon an incoming freshman or transfer student at the University of California.”</p>
<p>Why does it say 55,665 students applied when, in reality, 57,613 freshman and 18,743 transfer students applied?</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.today.ucla.edu/portal/ut/fall-2010-student-applications-152142.aspx[/url]”>http://www.today.ucla.edu/portal/ut/fall-2010-student-applications-152142.aspx</a></p>
<p>i dont know why you guys are nitpicking. its the letter i got. i did a screen cap and posted it on here. take it for what its worth.</p>
<p>Okay guys, I’m not pointing fingers or blaming anyone of being misleading…I’ll let you guys do that on your own…but that Regents letter said, “Of the record 55,665 students…”</p>
<p>Check this link out
[UCLA’s</a> applicant pool for fall is more diverse, stronger academically / UCLA Today](<a href=“http://www.today.ucla.edu/portal/ut/ucla-s-applicant-pool-for-fall-79372.aspx]UCLA’s”>http://www.today.ucla.edu/portal/ut/ucla-s-applicant-pool-for-fall-79372.aspx)</p>
<p>The beginning of the article says, “About 55,600 would-be freshmen and 16,500 transfer hopefuls applied to UCLA for FALL 2009…”</p>
<p>So either UCLA goofed and wrote 2009 numbers on their 2010 Regents letter or that letter is from last year.</p>
<p>Woot! I got it! Wasn’t expecting to but now I’m unbelievably stoked :D</p>
<p>And yeah, it does say freshmen and 55 thousand whatever students, so I guess it was just a goof on their part. I can do an SS if you really want.</p>
<p>Good job guys! Kinda disappointing for me, I was really hoping for it. Ah well, it’s still pretty effin’ sweet that I even got in.</p>
<p>Hmmmm…</p>
<p>When I logged into my URSA and clicked on the financial aid link, it automatically redirected me to the congratulations letter. I guess they set up a special page for people who got the regents because my financial aid page has links to a bunch of regents stuff. I’ll SS so you can see what I mean.</p>