[Sorry, long read ahead. It’s mostly me thinking out loud.]
My daughter is applying to Haverford ED2. While by no means a slam dunk, I think she has a decent shot since she went to Have-A-Look, and this whole college admissions process could be over in a little more than a month. (Thank god.) On the other hand, part of me thinks she might also have a decent shot at some other great schools she hasn’t had a chance to visit yet, like Vassar, Middlebury, Grinnell (maybe with merit aid?), etc. and I wonder if maybe she should have waited for the results at those schools - or maybe even her reaches like Amherst or Bowdoin. (She already submitted her ED2 application, so it’s moot at this point.)
So I guess I’m not sure I get why she’s so excited about Haverford in particular. Don’t get me wrong, I know it’s a great school. It’s just that there are so many other great schools in that category. (Also, for the record, I know that it doesn’t matter that I don’t get why she’s so excited, since I’m not the one who’s going to be going. As long as she’s excited, that’s really all that matters.)
When I asked her, she said that she really likes the honor code system there and the fact that students are trusted enough to be responsible. Personally, I’m not sure I get that. I mean it’s nice, but is that a reason to choose a school? Again, I feel like I’m missing something. They make such a big deal about the honor code, but I don’t see why it’s that interesting. I also didn’t want to be too skeptical about it in front of her, since I wouldn’t want her to pick up a vibe that I somehow disapprove of her choice.
The things I do like about Haverford are that the students seem to be fairly laid back and friendly, if a bit on the preppy side. The professors also seem to be really involved, even for a liberal arts college. I also really like the location. It’s remote enough that people won’t feel like they’re constantly being pulled away to the giant city right outside the gates (like, say, Columbia) but has really easy access to Philadelphia. Also the consortium seems good, though I’m not sure she’ll take advantage of it that much.
The things I’m a little on the fence about are:
Sports - Because it’s such a small school, a very large percentage of students are varsity athletes. When we visited, they made a point to show how they were better than their rival (Swarthmore maybe?) and how they beat them every year. For a non-sports kid, that seems like a negative.
Quaker-emphasis - I looked through the course catalog and there were a bunch of history classes that examined events through a Quaker lens, like Quakers and the Abolitionist Movement, etc. And although I do think it’s one of the chillest religions out there, we’re not Quaker, so I don’t think that’s a big plus.
Size - My daughter is interested in a small liberal arts school, so I get the appeal of small, but 1300 students seems crazy tiny to me. Most other LACs are around 2000.
Name recognition - Maybe it’s just me, but I had never heard of Haverford before she started looking at colleges. I had heard of some of its peer schools like Vassar, Middlebury, Bowdoin, Carleton, etc. Maybe that was just a gap in my knowledge, and it’s just as well known as those others. It just wasn’t on my radar. Then again, I do get that no one goes to a LAC for the brand name.
So yeah… kind of rambling at this point. If she gets in in a month, I want to be genuinely excited about it. Of course I’ll be excited that she’s excited, but I kind of want to love the school too. (Especially since it’s most of my life savings that will be paying for it!) What am I missing?