<p>Anonymous, you would know this more than me but unless you are planning on doing med school or independent research as an undergrad, couldn’t a premed student simply memorize the “mechanisms of a cell or the infinite processes of DNA.” At the undergrad level, you’re not going to being doing any groundbreaking discoveries or anything near that and therefore wouldn’t memorization be sufficient for that mighty A? Once again, I said you would definitely know more than me in this, but truthfully is simple memorization sufficient at the Undergrad level? </p>
<p>“you must be going for the big law degree, i guess it’s true that one doesn’t need to know anything to be an ambulance chaser”. - **** You</p>
<p>I am majoring in History and planning on double majoring in Philosophy with the intentions of going to law school and eventually become a DA… Basically, all you have done this entire forum is **** on history… when you got called out on that, you decided to move towards Philosophy and got called out on that. Now instead of acting like a mature adult you acted like a 15 year old kid which is ironic since that’s exactly what you accused grey_ of being… I’m not going to lie, there are a lot of crummy lawyers out there just looking to make some money… but guess what, the same exact thing can be applied to doctors. Heck, why do you even think we are in a huge medical fiasco right now… It’s because all parties… not just the insurance companies want more money. Its amazing, you go to countries outside the U.S. and doctors actually make maybe 100k a year and they are happy with it, here doctors are *****ing that 350k a year isn’t enough… It’s absolutely ridiculous that the medical field has become about the business opposed to just helping others. </p>
<p>Finally, I am not trying to argue that Sciences are easier than Philosophy or History, I am just stating that Philosophy is no cake walk outside of CC’s and that you have completely failed at this thread.</p>
<p>it’s the same 3 people (a CC “premed”, a history major, and a philosophy transfer) agreeing over things they have no idea about, i doubt anyone of them has taken an advanced science course :D</p>
<p>grey PMed me and wrote me a really upset letter…it was hilarious. and it’s over, so don’t revive a dead thread from page 2 to make stupid comment</p>
<p>*
I am majoring in History and planning on double majoring in Philosophy with the intentions of going to law school and eventually become a DA (…?)… Basically, all you have done this entire forum is **** on history…
*
hm…go back into my post history and show me where…</p>
<p>*I’m not going to lie, there are a lot of crummy lawyers out there just looking to make some money… but guess what, the same exact thing can be applied to doctors. Heck, why do you even think we are in a huge medical fiasco right now… It’s because all parties… not just the insurance companies want more money. Its amazing, you go to countries outside the U.S. and doctors actually make maybe 100k a year and they are happy with it, here doctors are *****ing that 350k a year isn’t enough… It’s absolutely ridiculous that the medical field has become about the business opposed to just helping others.
*</p>
<p>?</p>
<p>…Why did you write this?</p>
<p>Finally, I am not trying to argue that Sciences are easier than Philosophy or History, I am just stating that Philosophy is no cake walk outside of CC’s and that you have completely failed at this thread (how can you fail at a thread? :().</p>
<p>I think that all 3 of you have articulated this in different ways. So here is a general consensus between the 4 of us…sciences aren’t easier than philosophy.</p>
<p>now stick with me cuz this is going to get a little confusing…if sciences aren’t easier than philosophy…then sciences **are **____than philosophy (what is another way to say not easier?)</p>
<p>and for warriors, you’re in high school. Coming from someone who was accepted to UCLA and Cal let me tell you, it’s not really that confusing. If you have above a 3.0 TAG the school’s you want to go to, if you have good grades get TAP w/ UCLA. If you’re poor, get TAP with Cal. </p>
<p>AP courses do count toward your prerequisites if it says so on assist.org </p>
<p>They are GUARANTEED acceptance because they are agreements, legal agreements that say if you stick to the schedule you provide them, and maintain the same GPA (>3.0) they will have a spot for you in their school. I was able to sign one with Davis and SD each and I was able to throw them both away after getting into my top schools. </p>
<p>It’s easy…calm down talk to a counselor at drop in, some are clueless, but all of them know more about the system than people on these boards. </p>
<h1>2…“a major like history requires no effort because a 5 year old could get into UCLA by taking the three required prerequisites” - quote by you sir…</h1>
<h1>3… lets see, you insulted everyone going into the law field calling them ‘ambulance chasers’ … so I was simply went on a tangent showing that those in the medical field are no more innocent.</h1>
<h1>4… I’ll go ahead and fill in the blank… ummm ‘equally difficult’ for 2 points???</h1>
<p>This isn’t actually what I believe, I’ve made it clear I think sciences are more difficult than History, however, this entire thread you have made it seem as though you think philosophy and history require no effort at all which I, as well as the other reasonable people on this site, have clearly stated many times that you are wrong. Now please, take the stick out of your ass, look in the mirror, and please realize that your not the **** nor will you ever be.</p>
<p>1) I was wondering why you wrote that. You must not know much about the field of law. It’s okay to dream about being a DA, but to have expectations about doing it is another thing.</p>
<p>2) Great one quote constitutes “all you have done”. I guess when someone gets punched in a bar fight, you would report it as a massacre (no wonder you’re prelaw) </p>
<p>3) That’s stupid…your argument is flawed and it has nothing to do with the subject! bahaha</p>
<p>4) No the answer is “harder” I would start studying for the LSAT asap if that is the extent of your reasoning ability </p>
<p>*“This isn’t actually what I believe” *</p>
<p>:D:D:D:D why did you write it then??? :D:D:D:D</p>
<p>just for your own knowledge, “everybody on this thread” consists of a community college “premed” who doesn’t know the first thing about admissions into medical school and two self proclaimed critical thinkers who are prelaw where one believes that science classes are easier (or doesn’t…i guess we’ll find out) and another who thinks that philosophy is the hardest subject in the world.</p>
<p>at least grey put up a good fight…you don’t even believe what you argue!! :):)</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Its obviously a goal, there is no reason at all not to at least go for it. Also, I don’t really care so much about being The District Attorney, more so, I would like to work in the office being an investigator or litigator. </p></li>
<li><p>the “all you have done” constituted for the entire sentence of where you got that quote from… not just the history part but the philosophy part as well. In your post you only asked for proof on you ****ting on History not Philosphy… good job not even knowing what you posted as well as good job attempting to take a quote out of context to try to win an argument… you should work for Fox News.</p></li>
<li><p>Your right, me mentioning doctors in my tangent has absolutely Nothing to do with the medical field… ya I see once again how smart you are.</p></li>
<li><p>I was simply stating that there was more than one answer to your semi rhetoric question… The reason I wrote it was to show you that… Like I have said, “sciences are more difficult than History” but that is in my perspective. If a scientist is unable to write a critical paper, then perhaps history would be more difficult for them. What one person finds difficult is completely relative towards the individual. On an overall consensus, I would say Sciences are more difficult than history and philosophy, however, like I have said many many times, Philosophy and History are no walk in the park at the University level. This is all I have been trying to claim yet you somehow continue to avoid this by taking quotes out of context or completely forgetting why something was said. Anyways, I retire from this thread, you can have last word, give yourself some huuuuuuge ego boost wrongfully thinking that you ‘won’ the argument.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>*“there is no reason at all not to at least go for it” *</p>
<p>What can your actions now do to help you become a DA exactly? It’s like predental students saying they’re going to be an orthodontists when they don’t know that only 7-8% of dental students are actually accepted into a program (not to say I’m a predent).</p>
<p>-called out?
If you go back and actually read it, we were in agreement in everything besides the fact that a classes difficulty is dictated more by the class than the professor.</p>
<p>*</p>
<p>Your right, me mentioning doctors in my tangent has absolutely Nothing to do with the medical field… ya I see once again how smart you are.*</p>
<p>thank you! (it finally gets through)…i don’t understand how the medical field came into the context of this discussion…when did I say I was premed again? :)</p>
<p>Again, I’m not sure how you view this as a win/fail situation, maybe that would be your ego seeking some sort of appeasement from an online forum.</p>