<p>I've done 5 college board questions and my maths increased to around 700~760 but my critical reading is still in the LOW 500's!</p>
<p>I partly blame myself for not reading books when I was younger, but I need a quick practical solution. I've tried out noitaraprep (reading a passage then answering questions specific to that passage) and also tried skimming the whole passage then answering the question.</p>
<p>The problem is, when I use noitaraprep's method, sometimes, to answer a question you have to know the general mood, and what happens next in the Passage, especially if it is a novel passage.</p>
<p>If I skim the passage first, I run out of time because I have to re-read everything.</p>
<p>The main problem is, even though I understand the main idea of the passage, I can't seem to extract the 'evidence' to support my answers. </p>
<p>For example, when there is a line reference question 42-46 but then the 'evidence' to an answer is at 23-25, completely off range! I just don't have a great memory to remember that and answer the line specific question. </p>
<p>I also tend to forget what is told in the previous paragraph when I go on to the next and king notes seem to break my chain of thoughts!</p>
<p>My test is in January 25th!</p>
<p>Help :(</p>