<p>i don't think i'll retake it, it just sucks because i always wanted that 2400! oh well, i was (relatively) close this time. good enough i guess!</p>
<p>lmao...why don't u try the ACT...that's what i did. i got like 10 points lower than u on the SATs and wasn't <em>completely</em> satisfied and then took the ACT and got a 36 (without practice yay - its easier)</p>
<p>well that's what i thought, because i've never taken an ACT in practice before, but i knew that even if i did horribly my SAT was still satisfactory and i could just not send the ACT</p>
<p>and then i got a 36</p>
<p>my non-800 Math SAT score is a good conversation starter, though.</p>
<p>If i was a college I would reject anybody who retook a 2300+ unless they had a damn good reason to retake it - this just screams "I'm an elitist ****** who only cares about name-brand schools"</p>
<p>LOL good luck with ivies then. You are right, only 2350+ scores will get you in. They see your score, they will reject you right away. I'm sorry.</p>
<p>what is that supposed to mean? hammer, you're the only person on this thread whose actually recommended retaking it. i only wanted to retake it because i wanted to do all i could in order to improve my chances of getting in. it's nothing about snobbery or anything. i don't want to be pretentious- believe me! if i had it my way i wouldn't touch those sat's once anymore, but i just don't know if it's worth the risk. i already told myself that if i got 2350+ i wouldn't retake. but 2310 is just barely above 2300... sighh.</p>