<p>Was ap biology more like biology E or m, for sat 2.
I know it has a lot of both, but what more of.
What does ap prepare you more to?
% can be helpfull</p>
<p>such as % E
% M.</p>
<p>anybody???</p>
<p>I can't give you a percent, but I found AP to be much more helpful for the bio-M. I found bio-M to be extremely easy after AP. We didn't really cover most of the E stuff until the end of the year anyway, and it wasn't in great detail.</p>
<p>i say the same as goldshadow...i say AP makes the bio-M much easier...the bio-E was still confusing</p>
<p>Bio E is like entirely memorization. I honestly don't see why anyone would want to take it, but that's just me...</p>
<p>Bio M was based more upon trivial fact, whereas AP Bio focused more upon the general areas of biology like genetics and animal and plant systems. If you're taking AP Bio right now, (I took this last year as a freshman, as well as Bio M) and plan to take Bio M, focus on plant and animal systems a lot more, since they like to test you on that knowledge.</p>
<p>Everyone I've heard of taking the subject test for Bio said that Bio E was harder, but if you're really good at Ecology, you can take the Bio E and come out fine. However, I do remember thinking that the SAT II Bio was harder than the AP last year, since it focused on slightly more random details.</p>