I used "disillusion" instead of "delusion". How ****ed am I?

<p>Haha MrPropapanda, that was brilliant!</p>

<p>if it makes you feel better, i spelled physics without an s when i was listing my courses =]…phyics</p>

<p>Well, thanks guys. :slight_smile:
I guess it really can’t be helped.</p>

<p>Yeah, don’t worry I had a typo in my additional info. It was the ONE section that I didn’t spell check…</p>

<p>@MrPropapanda: Does Schrodinger agree or challenge this? I thought he was against Copenhagen’s interpretation.</p>

<p>Due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, we may never know.</p>

<p>You’re right, MrPropapanda.</p>

<p>Not exactly.</p>

<p>Okay physicists, I think there might be possibility that right now MrPanda is at kenhungkk’s place, using kenhungkk’s computer, and just a 1/n second (n->0) later, kenhungkk is standing next to MrPanda kicking him, but just before kenhungkk can put a foot on MrPanda, MrPanda is right back to his own place, using his own computer, laughing, and vice versa :smiley: :smiley: :smiley: I wonder, are you guys that tiny? :smiley: :smiley: :D</p>

<p>don’t u mean n-> infinity?</p>

<p>Oh, sorry :smiley: :smiley: :smiley:
There is possibility that the stubborn computer may change my “infinity” into “0” lol</p>

<ol>
<li>Wouldn’t it be much easier if you just said n seconds (n->0)? But we are humans. And humans like to do things the hard way. We like to complicate things a lot.</li>
</ol>

<p>But then after making it a mess, we simplify our mess :smiley: :smiley: :smiley: Anyway, I prefer 1/n than n :smiley:
Okay, stop right here. We are going too far.</p>

<p>Distance is relative. By the way, I didn’t know that I moved. Have I even moved? O.o</p>

<p>The answer (probably) is 50% :smiley: :smiley: :smiley:
I wonder, what’s wrong with you? You funny Panda just becomes a thinker lost in thoughts.</p>

<p>No, not really. I’m just finding the question to Life, the Universe, and Everything. I’ve got the answer though.</p>

<p>What’ is it? :smiley: Panda’s uncertainty principle? Or MrPanda-kenhungkk duality? :D</p>

<p>Oh you didn’t know? It’s 42.</p>

<p>42? Or you mean 43?</p>

<p>I have spent 1337 years in searching for the question. And thus far, I’ve come up with one possibility.</p>

<p>What’s six times nine? 42.</p>