<p>...should I send them anyways? I have to send them to UC's and Wesleyan cause they ask for them but...</p>
<p>Brandeis, Penn, Northwestern, Vanderbilt, Richmond - don't require SAT II's if you submit ACT instead of SAT</p>
<p>I got a 32 on the ACT and:</p>
<p>Lit - 650
Math II - 740</p>
<p>Also I already got into Kansas, Pitt, and Indiana with scholarship$</p>
<p>Thanks for your help</p>
<p>yea, send them regardless if you’re satisfied with your scores. that’s what i’m going to do anyway.</p>
<p>bump - other opinions?</p>
<p>I agree with mangomunky. Send all scores. They’re good scores – good enough, even if you’re not happy with them. They show that you’re well-rounded, that you’ve been working hard in your free-time, and that you’re taking your college apps seriously. There’s absolutely nothing to lose by sending all scores.</p>
<p>I wouldn’t call him"well-rounded" based on those scores, although they shouldn’t hurt. The general policy is that standardized test scores can only help you in admissions. If they feel your scores are sub-par, they’ll just ignore them.</p>
<p>Those are all good scores. Not amazing scores, but good ones. Not comparable to lots of CCer’s, but still above average in Lit and well above average in Math. And the ACT score is very good. People on these sites seem to have a skewed sense of the average applicant. Posters here are generally well above average. OP has listed some schools that are good matches.</p>