<p>I was thinking about doubling up on chem and bio H. I have heard that you need bio to do chem...is there any truth to this?</p>
<p>If anything you need (basic) chem to do bio.</p>
<p>It makes more logical sense to take chemistry before you take biology.</p>
<p>lol ^^^ wow. Thanks guys</p>
<p>At my school biology is a prerequisite for regular chemistry. I don’t understand that seeing how it’s not really connected at all.</p>
<p>My high school has biology for freshman and chemistry for sophomores as well; however, from my experience, it is more of the other way around. There is quite a bit of chemistry concepts and such in biology.</p>
<p>Chem should be a prerequisite for bio. No bio is needed for chem.</p>
<p>If anything, Chem is needed for Bio.</p>
<p>Some chem is needed for bio. At my school it goes intro physics, chem, bio,</p>
<p>I took both, and the standard curriculum here (and nearby regions) for some reason is bio first…lol I think chem should be first but w/e.</p>
<p>It’s fine doubling up on both, it won’t matter.</p>