<p>After taking the SAT for the first time saturday, i feel like the CR and W sections were much easier than the practice tests. Now of course i may be wrong and could have got multiple questions wrong in each, but i feel much better about both than when i took the practice tests in the blue book, the math was about the same and i stupidly assumed that the second math section i did was experimental so i ran out of time near the end. But overall i felt that the real deal was slighter easier. Does anyone else feel this way.</p>
<p>I think it depends on the type of book you use. I’m not sure which book is the blue book, but I felt that Kaplan wasn’t as hard as the actual SAT. On the other hand, I thought the Barron’s SAT book was more difficult than the real SAT.</p>
<p>Yeah, it depends on the book you used to study with. I used the Princeton Review, and I thought they were about the same.</p>
<p>i used the second edition blue book and felt the reading was easier, maybe it was the luck of the draw, i know that the Barron’s math however is usually harder than SAT math.</p>
<p>I did better on the real SAT than the practice test I took out of college board’s blue book, so perhaps it is!</p>
<p>Princeton Review has easy practice tests… Barrons’ practice tests are hard.</p>