<p>hahaa. Maybe this is a real stupid question but iam just wondering whether the College board has every made mistakes on students SAt scores or not. </p>
<p>Iam just hoping that my SAt is just a mistake. SOmehow. Please. </p>
<p>But by the way, how do u check whether the College Board does make a mistake this time or not???? SHould i pay the money to get my test back to check????</p>
<p>I mean the SAt Subject tests :P</p>
<p>Do you think you'd get the score back in time? Isn't it like 5 weeks or soemthing?</p>
<p>3 or 4 weeks i think. I mean/ i just want to see why my score is that low. I was shocked. When i saw the result, i nearly wished that i were dead.</p>
<p>What did you take? I got a real shock when i saw my U.S. History score. I know 660 isn't horrible (except here, when people seriously ask if a 730 should be retaken) but I'm already a "slight reach" for Berkeley.</p>
<p>you need the score report. if you find an error, and it is possible, however unlikely, then I guess you file a report.
However, I don't think you can blame your low score on CB. the worst that CB can do is mess up 1 question, which is not going to account for your low score. Also, if a question ever gets thrown out, it is not because it is factually incorrect or blatantly wrong. Usually the wording of the question is contested as being to ambiguous
The semi-good thing is the subject tests aren't as important.</p>
<p>well i believe there is someone who has posted on the ccd that his bio m marks ent up from a 620 to a 700 when he got them handchecked. so you can give it a shot - i am thinking abt doing that for my 670 lit score?/ its just that its so expensive :(</p>
<p>I also am thinking about handscoring my sat ii.
where are you guys from?
I'm from San Jose, CA</p>
<p>Iam from Washington Dc. Man, Collegeboard sux. There IS a problem on my score. i swear</p>
<p>Dude, seriously. I've seen you post about 100 times about your "low" math level 2 score and how you wish you were dead and whatnot because of it. </p>
<p>Really, man, just retake the test. It's a much cheaper option than getting this test rescored, and it's certainly far less dramatic.</p>
<p>I just realized how a lot of us (including me) are really upset about scores around mid- high 600s. I just realized how ridiculous that all is. I mean, we should be proud... those are good scores! Ignore the people whining about 750s... I honestly think they either have no lives whatsoever or are just being jerks. Collegeconfidential is apparently like the top .0000000001% of high school students. Top-tier UC schools place high importance on SAT IIs and from what I've read their average... average scores are around 685, while most of us would consider a 680 scandalous.</p>
<p>hahahaha. Sorry dude. i was just shocked. I didnt try to be dramatized so sumthin. But i get over it. Yeah. I definitely will take it again. Coz even if my score is incorrect, it couldnt be 800 coz i didnt do REally well on it. but i expected it to be sumthing above 770. </p>
<p>but anyway, iam retaking it. I want to get 800 ( haha sound a little bit optimistic). </p>
<p>Sorry if i acted a little bit too drama.</p>
<p>Let's just wait until the score reports come out. I'm thinking that (correct me if I'm wrong) the score reports come out and say I omitted many, which is not what I did and means the machine didn't read some of the answer choices, then I'd go for the hand scoring. If they say I made mistakes, then it proves that I truly did bad. Am I right???
I'm just afraid I could have done some technical error (poor bubbling). But I don't blame the scoring machines, because I was told they hardly are wrong. Then I would just waste my 50 bucks.
If I didn't fill in the oval darkly and completely, then it would turn out to be my fault and I might end up with same or even lower scores, right?</p>
<p>Well if we wait for the score report to come out then it might be too late for colleges, because it takes 5 weeks to get hand scored results back.</p>