<p>I've taken two subject tests so far:</p>
<p>Math Level 2: 800
US History: 800</p>
<p>I've signed up for the Literature test next week and am consistently getting mid-high 600's on practice tests.</p>
<p>Would it be better for me to apply just with those two 800's or apply with two 800's and a sub-par 670 on the Literature? </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Don’t take the literature test if you’re gonna get a 670 on it. Two 800s is perfect, so quit while you’re ahead.</p>
<p>You should always take more than the minimum number that they require, but a third 670 score isn’t going to help much.</p>
<p>If you can do better in a science subject, that may be better than taking something where your score is under 700. Only Harvard recommends taking more subject tests and all others require only two (Yale, UPenn and Brown dont even need them if you take ACT).</p>
<p>If I did take a science subject test, the only viable option would be Physics (due to IB course scheduling)</p>
<p>However, since I have absolutely no intention of applying into the sciences/engineering, I honestly don’t see the merit/point of putting in effort to study for the Physics subject test.</p>
<p>So I guess the consensus is that I shouldn’t take that Literature test next weekend?</p>