<p>I never got the individualism passage so i guess so.
anyone remember what kind of SCs (and how many) did the Helen Keller experimental passage have? thanks.</p>
<p>mvmanno urs was def experimental i had that same section too! im so happy its experimental i thought it was realy hard. for anyone who had that math exp section---was that the section that had a question involving "w"? i dont remember the quesiton but the answer choices had like 6w, w-2/3, 6w-4.</p>
<p>I had the non-Newtonian reality (objective v. contextual, 20 Questions game). I have since learned it is experimental. Yay.</p>
<p>@neethu16</p>
<p>spurious .The company had been regarded as ''spurious'' before the woman fixed it and made it profitable</p>
<p>BTW,did every international test-taker had the same experimental section ?</p>
<p>answer to that was moribund not spurious..</p>
<p>On the same day there are several versions of the test; they differ by
- order of sections
- the type AND the content of the experimental sections.</p>
<p>Two "real" math or CR sections may happen back to back.</p>
<p>Lol this was the last question of the section ,so it was supposed to be hard.I hoped i would get all of the SCs correct...</p>
<p>:( that was the section in which i omitted two questions :( i thought that was tough... i found the others easy :( jus my luck....</p>
<p>just to make this clear, did everyone have the mae jamison article in the writing section... needless as to which experimental section you had?</p>
<p>ok this is the one i took. the fifth one was the CR experimental. does have an idea what this section had? was it the one with individualism?</p>
<ol>
<li> Essay
<ol>
<li>Mathematics (includes SPR questions)</li>
<li>Writing</li>
<li>Reading</li>
<li>Equating (the one that doesn't count toward your score)</li>
<li>Mathematics</li>
<li>Reading (includes two long passages)</li>
<li>Mathematics</li>
<li>Reading</li>
<li>Writing</li>
</ol></li>
</ol>
<p>If you took the black-and-white-cover version of the SAT on Saturday, January 24, 2009, you had one of two section orders. Your test was organized like this:</p>
<p>Essay
Mathematics (includes SPR questions)
Reading (includes 2 long passages)
Mathematics
Equating (the one that doesn't count toward your score)
Writing
Reading
Mathematics
Reading
Writing
OR, like this:</p>
<p>Essay
Reading
Mathematics (includes SPR questions)
Equating (the one that doesn't count toward your score)
Writing
Reading (includes 2 long passages)
Mathematics
Reading
Mathematics
Writing </p>
<p>Can anyone definitively recollect the experimental sections now?</p>
<ol>
<li>Essay</li>
<li>Mathematics (includes SPR questions)</li>
<li>Writing</li>
<li>Reading</li>
<li>Equating (the one that doesn't count toward your score)</li>
<li>Mathematics</li>
<li>Reading (includes two long passages)</li>
<li>Mathematics</li>
<li>Reading</li>
<li>Writing</li>
</ol>
<p>i took this one, my experimental section was critical reading with the diary</p>
<p>Is that experimental CR section the one w/ Shakespear/Newton reading?</p>
<p>^ yes .</p>
<p>i didn't have the newton one</p>
<p>Is it possible that they have more than one experimental CR sections?</p>
<p>yeahh, a girl in my room had the CR with newton, but nobody else that i talked to had my experimental (except on CC)</p>
<p>I've asked this before, but sorry, I just want a definitive answer.</p>
<p>The writing section with Mae Jamison was not the experimental writing section, correct?</p>
<p>No it's not.</p>
<p>yeah mae jamison was in my only 25 minute writing section, so it was not experimental</p>