<p>I think it was given.</p>
<p>how did you know the middle was 12 and 3 there is no way for you to deduce that.
it said that the middle was 15
and it also said that the part cutting it was 12
the figure seemed symetrical so i assumed 6 and 6
that would form two triangles of base 15 and height 6 ====90???</p>
<p>does anyone remember the EXACT question for the triangle one? (the one people say is 42) I can’t remember if i put 42 or not… was that a grid-in?</p>
<p>also, what was the question about the quadrilateral that is supposedly 135?</p>
<p>btw is the question with the bouquet in the experimental section?
i put 12 as the answer but i cant get 12 i always get 10 (he other choices were less than 10 thus i eliminated them)</p>
<p>I thought it said that the part of the middle segment was 12, not the segment cutting the middle segment.</p>
<p>which question are we talking about (12, segment, cutting the middle???)</p>
<p>The exact question for the isosceles triangle said that there was an isosceles triangle with lengths 20, n, and n. What is the minimum value of its perimeter?</p>
<p>
yeah the units of the slope were what got me as well. I’m still not sure…I put only I as correct because the question was in the beginning-middle of the section and I didn’t think they’d stick a question like that so early in the section :p</p>
<p>what was 29?</p>
<p>the 20 and n question answer was 42</p>
<p>why is 20, 20, 1 not right?</p>
<p>Whoa. Primes greater than 2 and difference 4 was 3 and 7, right?</p>
<p>^ F*** that question. I got it wrong, just for a careless recognition.</p>
<p>I put 20, 10 , and 10, but I just realized that 10 and 10 do not add up to an integer greater than 20.</p>
<p>It should’ve been 11, 11 and 20.</p>
<p>Answer is 42.</p>
<p>Omg…!</p>
<p>no. it said that there was no prime in between – and 5 was a prime number. it was 7 and 11, so the answer is 18.</p>
<p>No, I recall that it said greater than 2, with difference 4. 3 and 7 still are good?</p>
<p>**** I got 1 question wrong…
there goes my 2400…
What do you think the curve is for 1 wrong on this test…790/780?? even 770??</p>
<p>…</p>
<p>780 I’d bet.</p>
<p>it definitely said that there was no prime in between the two numbers. i had thought 3 and 7 too, but changed it when i realized that.</p>
<p>No it definitely said no primes in between.</p>
<p>is it possible to still get an 800 if you omit one??</p>