<p>hey. i just took the sat subject test in latin and thought it was fairly easy. i think i got anywhere from a 780 to an 800. I've taken three years of Latin: latin 1, latin ii honors, and latin iii advanced this year which covered all 512 lines of book 1 of vergil's aeneid. i got a 36 summa cum laude (very disappointed but oh well) on the nle this year in the latin poetry iii-iv and a 38 summa cum laude on the nle latin ii exam last year. there are only two other kids in my entire school that took the exam so i don't have much feedback to quench my curiousity for how other people felt about the exam. and it also seems like the threads regarding the june latin subject test so far are few (only 1 that i found). So i though i would start are thread that addresses some aspects of the exam and each one of you by means of some questions...1) how many years of latin have you had, what courses have you taken, have you taken the nle this year( which one) and how do you think it compares? 2) On a scale of 1-10 how difficult would you rank this test? 3) how many questions did you leave blank and what were they? 4) bring up any difficult/impossible/or questions you were unsure of and wish to know what other people put while putting ur answer also.</p>
<p>Here I go...</p>
<p>i already told you about my experience...</p>
<p>i thought the test was about a 4 or 5 in difficulty</p>
<p>i only left 1 blank...the scansion question...because i was really pressed for time and scansions generally take me longer than other questions</p>
<p>i wasn't sure about quite a few questions:</p>
<p>the derivation of pertinent: i put teneo</p>
<p>the derivation of remnant: really really sure i got wrong..i don't know what i was thinking but i put reminiscior..i think the answer was remaneo</p>
<p>one of the fill-ins where it was blank and then was followed by two ablatives consecutively...and the verb was like con-something...like a verb of talking...i put cum as the blank</p>
<p>one of the conditionals that was a fill-in: the blank was for the verb in the second clause...i put an imperfect subjunctive..because i believe in contrary-to-facts..which i believe it was...it either has two imperfect subjunctives or two pluperfect subjunctives...but i believe in rare cases there can be a mix...but since the first verb in the condition was an imperf. subj. i put another imp. subj.</p>
<p>the fill in that was in a sentence with licet...an impersonal verb which takes a dative of person..i believe this one was in the syntax substitution but i could be wrong...i just put the one that had the dative...like mihi..tibi..something like that...it was the first answer choice</p>
<p>the what does -que connect question in the first reading passage...i put that it connected two verbs one of which the -que was attached to...i believe it looked something like this: (verb x)-que eis (verb y)..im pretty sure eis was in btw the two ones i put -que connects</p>
<p>for the third passage the first question...i wasn't 100% sure i translated the ablative absolute correctly...don't really remember what i put or what it said (hopefully somebody else does)</p>
<p>the question that asked what tua modifies...i put the word for eloquence that was glossed and was in the next line</p>
<p>the question that asked what the antecedent of quam was...i put iram</p>
<p>the question that asked for a summary for the last line or two...i wasn't sure if the answer was the lawyer was making the judge angry/the judge was becoming angry or that he was soothing the judge's anger...but i put that he made the judge angry and i think that's right</p>
<p>and finally that question that asked something like how the lawyer felt about what he was doing...or about his defendant or something like that...i think the answer was in the line with the repetitions...like fleo and flere and another verb...</p>
<p>hopefully you remember some of these questions i'm unsure of and make posts about your own questions that hopefully i and others who took the test may answer...thanks for reading</p>