<p>What were the possible choices? Odds are, I put +6.</p>
<p>And I think I want a lenient curve more than anyone. I omitted a ridiculous amount of questions.</p>
<p>ya i omitted like 10, bye bye 800 already.. and i got like 8 wrong for sure already.. probably like 12-13 in total, i hope thats 700+</p>
<p>I omitted 13, with like 6-7 wrong, which comes out to like a 720-730. You'll be fine.</p>
<p>I've heard that the curves are predetermined, so they don't take into account the results of the tests. Does anyone know if this is true?</p>
<p>sorry if i misunderstood, but a -20 is still above a 700?</p>
<p>and yeah, ive heard that about curves as well. they may tweak it a little, but it by and large doesnt change (as ive heard)</p>
<p>^^Really?? -20 is still above 700?? You just made my day!!!</p>
<p>Hell yeah.</p>
<p>a -20 is not over a 700 hate to break it to you.</p>
<p>the chem curve is MUCH harsher than the physics curve.</p>
<p>in fact -20(raw score... if you're not including the guessing penalty) would probably be around a 680 .... definitely not a 700 though.</p>
<p>if -20 wasn't including the penalty then you would have like a 650 or so.</p>
<p>"wow.. im cancelling a possible 760. im crazy."</p>
<p>Kim, if you're in the class of '10.. you don't have to, since the collegeboard lets '10 show only the best scores.</p>
<p>wow u guys are such noobs i got a 800 on it last year by hacking it
...
just look at the black lines on the right of the test
duh</p>
<p>Equilibrium: Really? I didn't know about that....</p>
<p>what about me? i really need this if i'm going to get into harvard
10 right = 800? good curve?</p>
<p>
[quote]
what about me? i really need this if i'm going to get into harvard
10 right = 800? good curve?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Nope you can get like 4 wrong and get an 800. I got an 800 I May and I was fairly certain I got 0 wrong</p>
<p>Hey, guys, I am taking the SAT Subject Test in Chemistry in October and I am trying really hard to study for it. What book do you believe was most effective in studying for the SAT?</p>
<p>I am using Princeton Review SAT Chemistry currently. Some have suggested PR for AP Chem, Spark notes, and Barron's. What do you think? Any advice, comments, etc. would be greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>I hardly studied, which may be a reason for my projected low score....</p>
<p>The curve for chemistry is much lenient than many believe. It is similar to the Math IIC curve. The already-released test on College Board Subject Test Book does not represent the recent curve for SAT Chemistry.</p>
<p>-6~7 = 800</p>
<p>^ ya so that curve is more like the PR curve.</p>
<p>@Neineibu</p>
<p>Where did you get this info from?</p>
<p>ballin: I used PR and felt pretty prepared for the test, though I won't swear by it til I see my score...</p>
<p>If you took the PR practice tests, you would know that the Real thing was a bit tougher than the PR tests.... And PR tends to be harder than CB. So its safe to say -4 to -6 should give you 800</p>