<p>Whats the answer to that question girls?</p>
<p>^ Something about affection… I forget.</p>
<p>^Yes, so the answer was something about her connecting with her relatives.</p>
<p>He wanted her to like/love her relatives. Hence, “I would have been more FOND of them”.</p>
<p>there was one choice as increasing her affection for relatives…
since the question is “what does the girl think her father’s intention was,” would increasing affection be the right answer?
all the others did not seem to make sense…</p>
<p>can somebody tell me what the other options or the question for the curiosities on display for audience question?</p>
<p>In talent passage,
wasn’t there question about how the passage was organized and an answer like “the issue was stated and referenced studies were listed” or something like that? I got confused between that and sth else which I can’t remember right now.</p>
<p>Hi,
So can someone please tell me the updated list on the answers to the questions please? If you remember the question or the general content of it, it would help me a lot.</p>
<p>Much appreciated,
AJ</p>
<p>Yes, I put something else though, that was kind of similar.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That was definitely correct.</p>
<p>“the issue was stated and referenced studies were listed” </p>
<p>it was for talent passage.</p>
<p>^ it was relevant studies, right?</p>
<p>^ Yes.</p>
<p><10></p>
<p>yeah, relevent studies were listed to support the claim … something like that</p>
<p>**-- S/C – 14/19 **
Diverse
Devised
Ignominy
Acolyte
Ubiquitous
Apoplectic
Charismatic
Provisional
Matured, Fulfilling
???, Upbraid
Underdog
Pioneer, Vanguard
Complicity, Exonerated of
Fight, Rampant</p>
<p>– Short P –</p>
<p>Rachel Carson story
Marking a watershed moment in public
Respectful attitude</p>
<p>Literacy
Make a claim
Debatable</p>
<p>Independent Films
tone - resigned
familiar but alarmist
supercede by monetary
critigue // minor</p>
<p>**-- Long P – **</p>
<p>Talent/Practice
to examine a psychological experiment
“account” = explained
blurred cause and effect
separate groups cause didn’t want students to know
the issue was stated and referenced studies were listed</p>
<p>Boy and Author
Argentinian author and author reading stories aloud
Recount unusual experience –> new understanding
happy in his subordinate role (liked judgement of Borge)
author’s impression with reality
apprehending –> perceiving
author’s lack of control
valuable for readers make connections w/ past readings</p>
<p>Girl
father wanted her to go on the trip “deepen knowledge of family past”
“freedom” means “releasing emotional burdens”
appalled = different viewpoints have equal values
likes her grandfather because “he talked about the present”
felt “impatience” and “disdain” for parent’s nostalgia
“loved father like she loved a horse” = elaborate on previous sentence
old ways = snobbishly </p>
<p>Zoo
products of human culture
condition: state of being
spectatorship: strong disapproval
savvy about nature of zoos
curiosities on display for audience
unconcerned with debates about zoo
fun comes at the expense of real insight of animals
do not offer authentic experience of wild animals
passage 1 makes argument that passage 2 finds unpersuasive</p>
<p>does anyone recall if the argentinian author one with the readers and the zoo story in the same section?</p>
<p>in the girl passage
was the answer from the
“loved father like she loved a horse” question
inability to empathize with her father?</p>
<p>My CR Section was
– Rachel && Literacy (shorts)
– Borge (argentinian author)
– Zoo</p>
<p>Next Section
– film
– girl</p>
<p>Next section
– talent</p>
<p>^ Yes, and we’ve covered that already. BTW you copied some answers wrong. The “Films” passage should have “Passage 2 is more optimistic” instead of the “disgusted” answer (where did that come from anyway?!).</p>
<p>oooh i have no idea
I already saw it on the consolidated list from page 20 - 30 ish.
whats the answer?</p>