<p>dude...790.</p>
<p>an 800 still. ;)</p>
<p>i definately had an expiremental section but i dont know which one,
i had the dice q and i kinda just guess
did anyone have a q of 2 lines intersecting in quad 1, and f(X)= mx+b, and u had to find g(x)</p>
<p>did anyone have as a grid on 3 cubes stacked on top of each otehr and u had to find the surface area, i got like 74..</p>
<p>damn that trapezoid one was pretty easy. i was so perplexed because i was trying to find the area of the trapezoid, trying to find the two bases, which were radicals and stuff. if only i had kept the guess i had, i woulda been rigth</p>
<p>oops, i mean 7 + 2 = 9.</p>
<p>9 is not prime.</p>
<p>7^3 is prime. 3
come to think of it, that problem is bogus!</p>
<p>myopic, i think it had to be > 5.
Anyway, if you DID plug-in 3, you would see that 3^3 = 27 which is divisible by both 3 and 9.</p>
<p>that problem sucked.</p>
<p>myopic, 7^3 is not prime, it is divisible by both 7 and 49.</p>
<p>Wait, what?! I'm so confused. I don't remember any part of the question that said it had to be >5 or something.</p>
<p>
[Quote]
that problem sucked.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Heh.. agreed. :)</p>
<p>I put p^3 as well...sigh. I was basing it off the notion that 11^3 = 1331, and was not divisible by the most common integers (2 to 9). I just had my grapher make a table for the values of y = 1331/x, and when you divide 1331 by 11, you get 121...so 1331 is not prime. Was the problem phrased like, which choice MUST result in another prime number?</p>
<p>Edit: I just realized how moronic this post sounds. The result of any integer squared/cubed/etc is always composite...doh. <em>smacks forehead</em></p>
<p>Caedar, that's what I remember but i'm not 100% sure on it, need someone to verify that for me.</p>
<p>"Wait, what?! I'm so confused. I don't remember any part of the question that said it had to be >5 or something."</p>
<p>n>5,
answer is I. n+2
ex 17=15+2 or 19=17+2</p>
<p>end of discussion</p>
<p>I remember it saying p was > 5.</p>
<p>Thanks for the verification. :)</p>
<p>19 + 2 = 21.</p>
<p>you see, n+2 is quite odd.</p>
<p>yeah that problem was definitely phased in a weird way, i don't know what they were trying to get at..</p>
<p>wow, i don't remember doing 3/4 of these</p>
<p>was the section 2 math experimental??</p>
<p>there's a dice question does anybody know the answer?</p>
<p>you role two dice
what's the probability that they share a common factor >1
i got 16/36....yes?</p>