<p>I said it was fine as it is since ‘than’ was used in the right context.</p>
<p>Was one of the answers reverent? Sorry if this was discussed already.</p>
<p>^no it wasn’t discussed and yes it was one of the answers.</p>
<p>Yup thats what I got</p>
<p>I have two questions I was definitely unsure about.</p>
<p>For the passage about the cook, what was the best way to conclude the last paragraph? The choices were like:
-the cook would think that writing, like cooking, is something something and modest in proportion
-people who read the cook’s writing would ________
-something
-something</p>
<p>i believe I put that the cook would think writing is modest in proportion and the other description >___></p>
<p>The second question I have refers to aurora passage
It was something along the lines of: “if all of these are correct, which proves the soundness of (scientist) theory?”</p>
<p>I put no change, which was the discovery of solar winds.</p>
<p>^i put what you put for the second one. but the first question i cannot remember.</p>
<p>I put the modest proportion option. I don’t recall the other question your are talking about.</p>
<p>lol CC on a phone.
EDIT: You are</p>
<p>I got the solarwinds one, I dont recall the first question</p>
<p>what?
hjdofdjlsdjfhilds</p>
<p>yeah rock what are you talking about lol</p>
<p>How is the three courses question philosophy? I said keep it because it shows how long creating one meal can take. I thought that since she was talking about how one course can be just as good as three was meant to sound like she was saying you didn’t have to study long to be a good cook. Anyone else choose this?</p>
<p>^yea but then she compares her STYLE of COOKING TO HER STYLE OF WRITINGl. It’s her PHILOSOPHY.</p>
<p>Yup thats what I said. The eating thing was only talked about momentarily but then she started to talk about her philosophy</p>
<p>Ahhh I see now.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember anything else about the solar winds question? I don’t remember answering that one at all. What were some other choices?</p>
<p>Is that the question that asked which would best describe the significance of the findings on the ship?</p>
<p>No, I dont think so. I think it was the one that talked about the cause of the aurora borealis or something like that.</p>
<p>Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, I completely forgot about that passage lol. Was that the question that asked which would support the author’s thinking?</p>
<p>it said which of the following would support the guys arguement or whatever. The rest of the answer choices did not make any sense, the solar wind of particles was the only one that made sense.</p>