<p>no… i guessed them</p>
<p>3x: Don’t remember the question, but the answer was like 599.7 or something
3x: The weird function that had a horizontal asymptote and exponents like -2x -> one time
3x: The trig question with ST/SR -> tany or something… I don’t remember exactly what it was but you had to use similar triangles to solve it
3x: “Length of chord BC” -> 15.3
3x: Distance between cars -> 60
4x: Double of one root in the equation x^2 - 24x + c (c was 128 I think) -> 16 (the answer), other root was 8
4x: Area of rectangle created under the sine curve -> ~1.1
49: 19th term</p>
<p>I was so sad. I had to skip 10 questions, but I was 100% on all of the other ones. Do you think I could pull a 700+ or possibly around a 760 with that?</p>
<p>@btbam1 - I got the same for all of those.</p>
<p>Did you guys get a lot of answer E’s in a row for problems 30 through 50?</p>
<p>Couldn’t the one regarding “2k+1” be “not all prime numbers are odd numbers”?</p>
<p>Since 2k+1 (when k is an integer) will only provide odd numbers regardless whether or not k is even/odd - by stating not all prime numbers are odd numbers could work too.</p>
<p>For the double of one root question, 16 wasnt one of the answers, I think. I distinctly remember putting down 8 as the answer, which would also be correct.</p>
<p>16 was (A). 8 wasn’t an answer, -8 was.</p>
<p>Oh crap! Yea, I got that wrong…</p>
<p>@btbam1 - Wasn’t the wording “Not all odd numbers are prime numbers”?
@parent14 - Did you put down -8?</p>
<p>@universalPB- yea i put down -8</p>
<p>@UniversalPB - I’m pretty sure the wording was “not all prime numbers are odd numbers”</p>
<p>@btbam1- “Not all odd numbers are prime numbers” was what I thought it said…</p>
<p>wait wasn’t 16 (A) the answer to the double-root question? because x^2-24x+128=0 factored is (x-16)(x-8) and it works…</p>
<p>@btbam1 - I’m not entirely sure, but I’m pretty sure it was reversed. One of the options was definitely “2 is a prime number right”? Because if it was “not all prime numbers are odd numbers” would basically be the same thing said differently, and the question would have two answers.</p>
<p>@liv4physicz - 16 was the answer.</p>
<p>Couldnt you just say that “2 is a prime number” which was E
because 2k+1 is for no integer for k = 2?</p>
<p>and i said “2 is a prime number” because the only way you could satisfy p=2x+1 with p being equal to 2 would be making 2x=1, and thus x would have to equal 1/2 (and it said something like x could only be an integer).</p>
<p>@thread </p>
<p>By vieta’s formulas, the sum of the roots of an odd function equal the opposite of the coefficient of the second largest term, which would be -(-24), meaning the sum is positive, so the roots are 8 and 16, and 16 was the only option listed.</p>
<p>And the prime question isn’t not all primes are odd, because 2 is the only even prime, and you can’t get 2k +1 = 2 with integer values of k. The answer was a proof by construction, and liv4 was correct.</p>
<p>btbam: yep, just realized it is. -8 doesn’t work. YES! :)</p>
<p>and by the way, i’m pretty sure about the “2 is a prime number” answer.</p>
<p>would 5 omitted, but all the rest correct equate to a score of 800?!</p>