<p>Well just got back from the test, i was very surprised by the Science section. I found it way tougher than febuarys test. Anyone have problem with the hypothesis of the DNA's? I didn't have enough time to really get good answers on all of them.</p>
<p>OMG YES xD i just kinda picked the ones that looked right 
i found the whole thing to be terrible except english and a little bit on the math.</p>
<p>Same here! Science was pretty hard, reading and english were really good, and math was mostly good, kind of iffy. I really hope the scale for science isn’t harsh, I really want a 32 :/</p>
<p>I felt like English was a bit easier, I’m hoping to pull my score up in that in the Mid to upper 20’s. The math I soared through the first 30, I was confident with every answer, then it got a bit tuffer towards the end but I think I did well on it. I thought the reading was pretty simple other than the article with the interview of the writer was a little odd. Science was pretty simple until I hit that last article with 10 minutes and just couldn’t quite get a grasp on it.</p>
<p>I thought math and science were much harder than the practice tests i took with Princeton/The Real ACT</p>
<p>Ugh freaking DNA passage… I couldn’t understand most of the passage let alone what the questions were asking… plus I was down to only 6 minutes
Whatever happened to good old conflicting viewpoints? Were those abominations 6 + 7 meant to be the CVs?</p>