<p>Does anyone know how accurate the practice tests in the Kaplan Math IIC book?
Also, does it prepare well for the actual test?</p>
<p>I find that the book sucks. There are many errors, which is a pretty bad thing for a math book (I found at least two problems in which the correct answer was not listed). I bought the Barron's book and am much happier with it.</p>
<p>What about PR's?</p>
<p>barron's is hard and you feel so stupid. BUT you feel so great when you get a problem.</p>
<p>i say "ewwww" to kaplan. useless.</p>
<p>Kaplan is easy. It doesn't help you much.
Barron is hard. It tells you useless stuff that you probably don't need.
I had REA and I thought it was pretty good.</p>
<p>kaplan sucks. if you want math 2 c go with barron's. yes, barron's is hard, but if you know how to do everything from barron's, there is no way you can get a score below 750 on the actual test</p>
<p>The Kaplan IIc book is worthless. There are so many typos/errors that you will either learn something incorrectly or throw the book down because you notice so many of them.</p>
<p>I recommend PR for IIc.</p>
<p>Does anybody know if the Kaplan Physics book is filled with errors like the Math IIc book is?</p>