<p>
</p>
<p>I never said anything like that. I said – be diplomatic, respectful. Listen to the father’s side of the story. Find out what his problems and concerns are. And work from there. Hopefully, once the difference are ironed out, the OP will figure out what the dad is willing to do, and how much he is willing to contribute financially – and obtain his signature on needed documents.</p>
<p>I don’t think the goal should be for the kid to try to out-jerk her father. If he’s a jerk, there’s nothing she can do about it, but she doesn’t have to up the ante. </p>
<p>I don’t know a parent on the planet that will react well to their own kid treating them rudely or trying to get something from them through threats, pouting, whatever. (I financed my d’s education and the first 2 years of my son’s education, but if either one of them had pulled a stunt like threatening to cut off contact with me, I would have pulled the plug on the money instantly). </p>
<p>The kid wants money. If the head of a scholarship committee asked the recipient to show up for a interview as a condition of release of the funds, the recipient would probably not hesitate to show up. How anyone can think that its o.k. for a kid to expect a parent to fork over $22,000 he is not legally obligated to pay, but not be willing to sit down for a cup of coffee with the guy is beyond me. </p>
<p>The reason I suggested bringing a friend was because of the OP’s fear that the father would yell at her. If she arrives and it is clear that the father is going to treat her respectfully, the friend can leave. If it is a public cafe or restaurant, the friend can stick around, far enough to be out of earshot for whatever conversation is taking place, but near enough to come to the rescue if the guy starts shouting. </p>
<p>I’m skeptical about idea that the purpose of the meeting is so that the dad can yell at the kid anyway - that may be the kid’s view, but it doesn’t make sense from the father’s perspective. It may end up that every meeting between this particular father and kid turns into a shouting match… but if that’s the case, it’s also likely that the kid is contributing to the dynamic, whether she has the insight to realize that or not. It’s also possible that the kid knows exactly what the father is angry - or likely to be angry about – hence a real concern that the father wants to confront the kid. And again – that could be legitimate stuff or it could be parental overreaching – we don’t know. We’ve only heard the kid’s side of the story, not the father’s. </p>
<p>But we do know that the kid wants the father’s money. </p>
<p>My whole point is that if the kid wants money from her father, she has to make nice to the guy – because it is very likely that he has a legal right to cut her off entirely if she treats him like dirt. Maybe not – maybe they live in a state that requires him to pay some sort of money for college, but it probably isn’t anything like the contribution she wants. </p>
<p>Going back to the OP, and reading between the lines, here is what I see:</p>
<p>Yesterday my father announced that he would not pay his share of my college fees;</p>
<p>Who decided what the father’s “share” would be? Is the “share” something the father agreed on, or something the mother simply expected or demanded?</p>
<p>* that share amounts to $36,000 including the employee child scholarship he refuses to sign his name on. …We may not be able to afford court, but even if we can, there is a chance that he still might get off with paying only $8000 due to some ambiguous language last time we were in court. *</p>
<p>This indicates that at most, the divorce decree requires payment of $8,000. “Ambiguous” to the OP and her mom might be clear as day to the father. My guess: the decree requires the father to contribute $22K annually to college, and the father believes that the $14K employee child scholarship is subtracted from the $22K, leaving a net of $8,000 owing from him. After all, that’s his job benefit – something that would be lost if he ever changed employment. Mom & kid would like to interpret the provision as meaning the kid gets $14K + $22K (for $36K total) … but obviously it doesn’t say that explicitly.</p>
<p>So it may be that is what the dad wants to explain to his kid. And “explain” may be it – that the father has no intention whatsoever to pay more than that – or maybe the guy is willing to compromise and throw in a little more. The kid will never know unless she meets with her dad.</p>