<p>which gives the figures for class of 2006. The figures for class of 2007 should be posted soon.) </p>
<p>Yes, many colleges "superscore" (take the best score of each section for a student who submits more than one set of scores), but I have no reason to believe that the number of 2400-scorers by ANY methodology is as large as the entering class at a college as large as Princeton, Yale, or Harvard. (Caltech could JUST BARELY admit only 2400s-scorers, if enough of those decided to apply to Caltech, because it is a smaller college.) </p>
<p>Harvard decides admission cases as it does because its committees have accumulated a lot of experience. Scores are important, but other issues matter too. </p>
<p>This thread here is an interesting attempt to gather some anecdotes about students who had something other than test scores as a basis for being admitted, and that is an interesting topic.</p>
<p>A girl I know got into Haverford, Swarthmore, and Williams with an 1150 SAT. She was a urm, non-athlete, middle class. Another kid, also urm, middle class, non-athlete, got into Wharton with a 1320 SAT.</p>
<p>why dont you guys change the title to people who got 2300+ that got rejected/waitlisted to selective colleges...its probably gonna give you a better answer to the question you are asking now...</p>
<p>i mean i seriously think like 80+ percent of the people that make selective colleges get 2300-</p>
<p>alrite there may be lots of people getting in to top colleges with pretty low SAT. So now I have a question: what is the key you have that unlock the door to those schools ??? I see that you should have at least 2k SAT AND something extraordinary in your application that make the officials feel like they've found a genius :)
I have low SAT, not many EC but still desire to get into UPenn or top B Schools. I think I must do something huh :-?</p>
<p>a friend of mine got into CalTech with a 2130 i believe. he won like 1st place at every national harvard/mit math competition there was though so i guess it's a moot point.</p>