<p>is there a general consensus that if you are "in review 3.26- something other than 29" that you are accepted, and that if you are "acted upon" on 3.29 you are most likely a rejection?</p>
<p>this will make it easier for people i think to understand whats going on. or at least... what we think is going on. hahah</p>
<p>haha thanks cheerchick012, if i get accepted for spring then I am for sure headed to UCLA or Berkeley. :) anyone else? so is it just the people that are acted upon that may or may not be accepted?</p>
<p>i really think you all, for your own mental health, need to stop reading this forum. obsessing doesn't increase your chance of getting in and will make you go crazy, and this forum amplifies that. for you own peace of mine do something else, at least go to sleep. your responses will probably be there tomorrow, trying to deduce non-existant patterns is ridiculous and pointless. worrying is like a rocking chair, it is something to do but doesn't get you anywhere</p>
<p>But some of the speculation appears to be true:
East coast applicant
3/4 "received fall grades"
3/27 "in review"
no further status changes .....all added up to "spring admit"
(to Annenberg)</p>
<p>JW Muller: I think they only had 3/29 chances to "acted upon" because I believe all status changes on 3/28 and after were only to "acted upon". Just what I think.</p>