<p>navy2010 - you crack me up! Thanks for the levity. I appreciate your keeping us from getting too maudlin. </p>
<p>GoNavy2011 - #1 - Thanks for posting, although I don't necessarily agree with you. The point that it most important for me to make is that any one of the "gripes" that we have seen discussed/argued about this past week is not a deal-breaker or worthy of the uproar, but rather the wholesale "hammer" coming down on one and all and in almost all aspects of the Mid's daily lives. </p>
<p>Food - none of them will starve, I know that, you know that and the Mids know that. It may turn out that the 15 mando meals/week will be what it takes to make the difference to a plebe that can't get up the nerve to even have a discussion with an upperclass. The extra time with his squad-mates may be what keeps him in when he doubts if he can make it. Got it....let's give it a try, but anyone can see that there was inadequate preparation, on somebody's part...let the heads roll. No excuses. </p>
<p>Decreased liberty - hard to argue with this one. Too many upperclass coming in drunk, weekends and weekdays. Easy solution, no weekday liberty. I got no problem there. </p>
<p>Mando study hours 8-11pm - now we're getting into more of a "grey area." What is the purpose of mando study hours....was the overall GPA of the academy grads falling? What about the Mids that have good grades and they want to spend the study hour time doing extra work-outs to better their PRT scores? Or to try and qualify for a SEAL spot? Or the Mid that can't swim the best and is working on his 40-year swim? The point here is that at some time we have to let these soon-to-be Navy and Marine Corps officers learn how ot manage their time. If a Firstie is still failing the PRT or has lousy grades, it's too late for mando study hours to help him and he/she should be gone. </p>
<p>ECA's - this is a tough one. Which do you cut/cut-back and which does the Academy support? WP seems to have no problem supporting or at least tolerating multiples of ECA's (the list is incredble) and shoulder the lion's share of the boots on the ground fight in Iraq. I don't know for sure, but I'm betting that the cadets at WP are very much aware that there is a war on even when they're singing in a glee club concert or in a judo competition. And their Moms know that too. No one on this list, or any other I hope, thinks that because their Mid or Cadet participates in Mids for Kids or a production of the Pirates of Penzance that they are exempt from their duty or that they are somehow now unfit or unprepared for that duty. </p>
<p>Don't mistake concern voiced on this list for lack of awareness for the duty that awaits our sons and daughters. </p>
<p>I have had the privilege of being associated with THE Academy for more than 25 years in many capacities. In all that time I have never seen or heard the groundswell of concern that I have heard in the past 10 days. I'm not so gullible that a few grumbles about the lousy food would make me lose any sleep, or even the loss of weekday liberty. It's the big picture that I'm trying to figure out. My Mid will be gone in a year, honestly this really doesn't affect him much. But we'll be going to reunions, events on the Yard for many more years to come and I want the officers that graduate in 2020 to be just as prepared as the ones that graduated in 2007. I have not heard that the last few years has produced lesser-quality officers - has anyone else? Maybe if the fleet is giving feedback that the USNA grads are not able to hold their own against the previous grads or ROTC grads, then that's a different story and I will stand corrected.</p>
<p>And before I get blasted - I'm not saying that everything was sunshine and roses under the previous leadership. The new Supe has the authority and responsibility to make whatever changes necessary to fulfill the mission of the Academy. But was the problem that the old rules were wrong or was it that the old rules were not being uniformly enforced?</p>