<p>My question is: shouldn't the costant '2' of the original equation be carried out the other side of the equal sign which would change the answer completely? And why is it 2/4 instead of just 2? </p>
<p>...or is this just another of Barron's typos??</p>
<p>Divide both sides of the original by 4 to get: x^2 + y^2 - 3x - 4y - 2/4 = 0 (the reason they left it in the form of 2/4 is because, in completing the square, you have to add terms which have a denominator of 4…so 2/4 makes the whole equation look a little nicer).</p>
<p>Complete the square by adding 9/4 and 25/4 to both sides: (x^2 - 3x + 9/4) + (y^2 - 5y + 25/4) - 2/4 = 9/4 + 25/4</p>
<p>Simplify and take 2/4 to the right: (x-1.5)^2 + (y-2.5)^2 = 9/4 + 25/4 + 2/4 = 36/4 = 9</p>
<p>Even if you took it to the other side first, you’d get the same result. Take it to other side first, then divide by 4, then complete the square. Same thing.</p>