<p>This is for the Verbal questions, so stop discussing writing. What did you all say for the question that asked what the doctor among the Hmong wished to do initially? </p>
<p>observe whether certain inferences appeared or something, or treat the misunderstandings of the groups and foster good will?</p>
<p>I forget the exact answer choice, but the passage stated he sought to be on neutral ground and let things happen...except it stated it a little more eloquently than that. The answer choice had an interesting word in it...I'd know it if I saw it, but I can't tell you it now.</p>
<p>He had a whole metaphor about being a observer and not in the middle of a conflict initially until he had to do something LATER. So it was to be an observer.</p>
<p>But that metaphor explains what he believes after his ordeal with the Hmong people. He states that before this, he wants to stand between the two without getting in the line of fire. He hopes that the two cultures will illuminate each other in order to dispel the misunderstandings each group has of each other.</p>
<p>(Didn't finish post)</p>
<p>He has to have wanted to take a more active role, and intervened.</p>
<ul>
<li>plasticity</li>
<li>chicanery</li>
<li>indispensable</li>
<li>disingenuous</li>
<li>revitalize, consign</li>
<li>contiguous
and i put the "for" answer for that writing question</li>
</ul>
<p>HELTAHIR - No that paragraph began with when he first arrived he wanted to be an observer and see the two affect each other. In the second to last paragraph he concluded that that couldn't happen so he wanted to take a more active role. It was being an observer.</p>
<p>A question about the two passages regarding human cloning. One question asked how the tone of passage one compares to passage two, I answered that passage one is more tempered than passage two. Can anyone confirm this?</p>
<p>yeah, i put that also</p>
<p>Dualityim, I agree with you. The first one kind of points out how strange the phenomenon (of people loving recyclying) is despite its flaws and convoluted-ness, while the second one kinda goes "RAHR! Recylcing bad! Eat blood!"</p>
<p>can people post more questions/answers from the passage about the theater??</p>
<p>For the bar thing I put the answer with imitated. What is a bar? Whatever it was, I can't imagine them rescuing and relocating it from another city. ANYTHING is cheaper to rebuild than move that far, unless they are talking about a towel rod or something and that would be stupid to include. I'm guessing bar is like a drinking bar only more sophisticated since its a theatre, and they imitated the other one.</p>
<p>o, i put rescued and relocated. i'm not sure tho</p>
<p>A bar was probably a nice object of some sort. I have a vague image of it in my head, but it's not based on fact. Whatever it is, it is apparently something of value. The New York opera house was demolished. The bar that was from it turned up in St. Louis. That suggests that it was apparently retrieved (or rescued) from the building before or after it was demolished and relocated. </p>
<p>There is nothing to suggest that the bar is not the same exact bar from the Opera House in NY.</p>
<p>What was the revitalize/consign question?</p>
<p>I believe it was some author revitalizing aspects of black literature...</p>
<p>It was that lady that revived Zora Neal Hurston's crap.</p>
<p>ehhh silly silly people...</p>
<p>the bar was imitated bc the entire new york opera house was demolished... there were no inferences or assumptions needed - its simply common sense</p>
<p>What were other close choices? Trying to remember if I put revive.</p>
<p>i didnt have black literature one
must be experimental</p>