<p>^ experimental</p>
<p>Im looking at a 710-720. Will retake until it hits 770+ Yes I’m a typical CC’er ■■■ XD</p>
<p>I really thought there were only three squares. Thats not the type of mistake I usually make.</p>
<p>@birdcat 750</p>
<p>
I think this was experimental. There were 3 squares. I believe the smallest one was 200 and the largest was 800</p>
<p>The square question was not experimental.</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure the area of the largest square one wasn’t experimental</p>
<p>The answer’s 800, not experimental. :D</p>
<p>I believe for me the smallest had an area of 100.</p>
<p>Well, with most the answers covered by the consolidated list, it looks like I didn’t repeat my dumb mistake for a 770 in January.</p>
<p>Hmm… okay. Well, here’s my math for 800:</p>
<p>sqrt(200)
line1 ^2
line2 / 2
sqrt(line3)
line4 </p>
<p>800, that’s what i got too. yay :)</p>
<p>So far nothing wrong, but let’s finish up this list!</p>
<p>Anyone remember questions? With even a vague reminder, I can remember answers.</p>
<p>where did sqt(200) come from?</p>
<p>
The area of the smallest square was 200. To get the side length, you take the square root.</p>
<p>see, on my test they gave me the side length of the smaller square to be 10. which made the area of my larger circle 400, so i think there were two versions.</p>
<p>Which underlined digit, if changed to zero, would decrease the number by the greatest amount. I believe the answer was 2, it was in the ten thousands place?</p>
<p>i remember only having three squares and the shortest side was 10 so the area was 100.
the middle square had a side with 10root2 so the area was 200. and the biggest square had a side of 20 and the area was 400</p>
<p>iloveyouz: we had the same thing.</p>
<p>
This was experimental. But the correct answer would always be the one furthest to the left.</p>
<p>
I highly doubt it. I really hope I didn’t misread, but I definitely remember a 200 in the question somewhere.</p>