Someone mark this essay pls;
Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and the assignment below.
Some people believe that there is only one foolproof plan, perfect solution, or correct interpretation. But nothing is ever that simple. For better or worse, for every so-called final answer there is another way of seeing things. There is always a “however”.
Assignment:
Is there always another explanation or another point of view? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience or observations.
When we find the quickest solution to a problem, we can impetuously that say that it is the most augmented way in doing so; since if it is practically feasible then there is no need to embark on alternative approaches. However I categorize myself along with those “people” who dissuade against such impulsive judgements since if we can pursue alternative solutions which surpass those of what we have uncovered initially, then it can only add as a catalyst to propel ourselves and make constructive resolutions.
Some people could argue that having that element of doubt - that “however” is detrimental to the short term solutions at hand since it brings about indecisiveness and uncertainty in everything that we participate in. Whilst hearing these initial temporary benefits of the opposition I feel assured in my reasoning that it is alternative solutions that we must seek – in fears of being left behind and regressing to medieval perspectives.
Take the inception of Facebook as an example to clarify my rationale. Mark Zuckerberg’s invention was only successful because of the underlying reason that he made Facebook unique to its fellow competitors. It was “exclusive” initially to the select few at Ivy League Universities and hence dissimilar to the demographics of other rival social networks at the time, such as that of Myspace and the now defunct Friendster.
From my further reading I came across the widely publicized case of that of former CIA officer, Aldrich Ames. Citing Ames, he claimed that he became a double agent for the KGB since it was the only means to which he felt would provide him with short term financial stability – in tandem to living a lavish lifestyle that he so craved for. However his acts of espionage induced him to be incarcerated in a maximum security prison facility. Had he carefully considered other avenues of financial merit, such as that of ‘investing in fluctuating stock markets’, or in ‘housing estates’ where growth was prevalent and lucrative he would have undoubtedly been sanguine with his autonomous prospects.
These explanations that I have provided resonate with the financial crisis in 2008, which compelled investors to seek diverse fiscal attitudes on an international scale. The initial over-indulgence in expenditure coupled with the stagnation of economic growth foolishly prompted crippling consequences in global economies. Subsequently individuals are now more financially savvy with their personal investments and more meticulous in their evaluation of stock prices and market fluctuations. Since there is nothing simple with stocks markets crashing nor with other such events - it is essential that consumers cognitively analyse situations exhaustively to avert these initial solutions for what they really are ceteris paribus.
Thanks 
